首页> 外文会议>Corrosion Conference and Expo >Correlation between streicher and epr test
【24h】

Correlation between streicher and epr test

机译:漂亮与EPR测试之间的相关性

获取原文

摘要

For characterization of susceptibility to intergranular corrosion different test methods are used. These tests are immersion test, such as Streicher-, Strauss- or Huey- test, as well as electrochemical methods, like the EPR test (electrochemical potentiokinetik reactivation) and the oxalic acid test. Where long-term immersion tests mainly evaluate grain dropping, short term electrochemical tests are evaluating grain etching. In this work one of each group of testing methods has been evaluated. These are the ASTM G28A Streicher test and the ASTM G108 EPR test. The results of both tests are compared for various CRAs (corrosion resist alloys). Alloys investigated are UNS S31600, UNS N08926 and UNS N06625 There is always a good correlation between both tests except when discontinuous depletion zone are present in the material. The advantage of short testing time of EPR is partially compensated by the necessity of optimization for each single material.
机译:用于表征易受晶间腐蚀的敏感性不同的测试方法。这些测试是浸入式测试,如中间师,斯特拉斯或Huey-试验,以及电化学方法,如EPR测试(电化学挥发性重新激活)和草酸试验。在长期浸渍试验主要评估晶粒滴,短期电化学测试正在评估晶粒蚀刻。在这项工作中,已经评估了每组测试方法中的一个。这些是ASTM G28A STREICHER测试和ASTM G108 EPR测试。将两个测试的结果与各种CRAS(腐蚀抗蚀剂合金)进行比较。研究的合金是UNS S31600,UNS N08926和UNS N06625在材料中存在不连续的耗尽区时,两种测试之间总是存在良好的相关性。通过对每个单一材料的优化的必要性,EPR的短期测试时间的优点是部分地补偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号