首页> 外文会议>Corrosion conference and expo >Correlation between streicher and epr test
【24h】

Correlation between streicher and epr test

机译:Streicher与epr检验之间的相关性

获取原文

摘要

For characterization of susceptibility to intergranular corrosion different test methods are used. These tests are immersion test, such as Streicher-, Strauss- or Huey- test, as well as electrochemical methods, like the EPR test (electrochemical potentiokinetik reactivation) and the oxalic acid test. Where long-term immersion tests mainly evaluate grain dropping, short term electrochemical tests are evaluating grain etching. In this work one of each group of testing methods has been evaluated. These are the ASTM G28A Streicher test and the ASTM G108 EPR test. The results of both tests are compared for various CRAs (corrosion resist alloys). Alloys investigated are UNS S31600, UNS N08926 and UNS N06625 There is always a good correlation between both tests except when discontinuous depletion zone are present in the material. The advantage of short testing time of EPR is partially compensated by the necessity of optimization for each single material.
机译:为了表征对晶间腐蚀的敏感性,使用了不同的测试方法。这些测试是浸入测试,例如Streicher-,Strauss-或Huey-test,以及电化学方法,例如EPR测试(电化学电位激酶活化)和草酸测试。在长期浸没测试主要评估晶粒掉落的地方,短期电化学测试则评估晶粒蚀刻的地方。在这项工作中,已经评估了每组测试方法中的一种。这些是ASTM G28A Streicher测试和ASTM G108 EPR测试。比较了两种测试结果对各种CRA(耐腐蚀合金)的影响。所研究的合金是UNS S31600,UNS N08926和UNS N06625,除非材料中存在不连续的耗尽区,否则两个测试之间始终具有良好的相关性。 EPR测试时间短的优势部分是通过对每种材料进行优化的必要性来部分弥补的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号