首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >WHY INDUSTRY SAYS THAT ENGINEERING GRADUATES HAVE POOR COMMUNICATION SKILLS: WHAT THE LITERATURE SAYS
【24h】

WHY INDUSTRY SAYS THAT ENGINEERING GRADUATES HAVE POOR COMMUNICATION SKILLS: WHAT THE LITERATURE SAYS

机译:为什么工业说,工程毕业生有差的沟通技巧:文献所说的是什么

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although engineering departments have worked hard at improving the communication skills of their students, a large percentage of industry managers consider the communication skills of engineering graduates to be weak. Why does industry consider these skills to be weak? Also, what particular aspects of written and oral presentation skills does industry consider to be weak in engineering graduates? This paper addresses these two questions through a review of multiple studies that have assessed the communication skills of recent engineering graduates. Our review has found that part of the disparity arises because the communication assignments that engineering students perform in college significantly differ from the writing situations (audiences, purposes, and occasions) that engineering graduates encounter in industry. New engineering graduates do not typically possess the expertise to realize what communication principles from classroom assignments apply, or do not apply, in different professional situations. Yet a third problem is that what constitutes strong communication skills in professional engineering settings may differ considerably from what is taught or expected in classroom settings. Although the literature provides these insights into the disparity, much still needs to be learned about the specific deficiencies in communication skills of entry-level engineers. One step that could be taken is for engineering departments to conduct longitudinal studies about how well their instruction on writing and oral communication prepares students for later classes, for internships and co-ops, and for employment. Departments at different institutions should consider adopting a core of common survey questions so that survey results can be compared. Another recommendation is that when incorporating writing into a course, engineering departments should consider the following two questions: 1. What communication skills do we want students to acquire? 2. How can technical assignments be designed to help students achieve those desired communication skills? To answer the first of these questions, engineering departments would do well to identify the specific communication traits that the employers of their graduates see as important. To answer the second question, engineering departments should consult with communication specialists, and preferably those familiar with the kinds of communication that engineers do.
机译:虽然工程部门在提高学生的沟通技巧方面努力工作,但大量的行业管理人员考虑了工程毕业生的沟通技巧。为什么行业考虑这些技能要疲软?此外,书面和口头呈现技能的特殊方面是行业认为在工程毕业生中疲软?本文通过审查多项研究来解决这两个问题,这些研究已经评估了近期工程毕业生的沟通技巧。我们的评论发现,部分差异是出现的,因为工程学生在学院表演的沟通分配与工程毕业生在行业中的写作情况(观众,目的和场合)有很大差异。新的工程毕业生通常不具备了解课堂作业的通信原则的专业知识,或者不适用于不同的专业情况。然而,第三个问题是,在课堂设置中教导或预期的内容中可能会发生强大的沟通技巧。虽然文献提供了这些见解,但仍然需要了解入门级工程师的沟通技巧的具体缺陷。可以采取的一步是为工程部门进行纵向研究,了解他们对写作和口头沟通的指导如何准备学生的后期课程,用于实习和合作,以及就业。不同机构的部门应考虑采用共同调查问题的核心,以便可以比较调查结果。另一项建议是,当将写作纳入课程时,工程部门应考虑以下两个问题:1。我们希望学生获得哪些沟通技巧? 2.技术任务如何旨在帮助学生实现这些所需的沟通技巧?为了回答这些问题的第一个问题,工程部门会做得很好,以确定其毕业生雇主认为重要的特定沟通特征。为了回答第二个问题,工程部门应咨询沟通专家,最好是熟悉工程师所做的沟通类型的专家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号