首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >TESTING FOR ETHICAL SENSITIVITY TO RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH AMONG MULTI-NATIONAL STEM RESEARCHERS
【24h】

TESTING FOR ETHICAL SENSITIVITY TO RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH AMONG MULTI-NATIONAL STEM RESEARCHERS

机译:伦理致敏感性对多国词干研究人员的伦理敏感性

获取原文

摘要

The "Four Component Model" of moral behavior developed by Rest, and applied to professional ethics by Bebeau and others argues that ethical behavior is a consequence of four factors: (1) ethical sensitivity, (2) ethical judgment, (3) ethical motivation and commitment, and (4) ethical character and competence. The majority of theoretical and pedagogical research in the field of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering (EESE) has centered on ethical judgment. Significantly, relatively little work has been done on ethical sensitivity in EESE even though ethical sensitivity provides an individual with the range of concrete considerations upon which that person makes ethical judgments. Ethical sensitivity determines an individual's ability to recognize in any given situation what ethical issues are at stake, the possible consequences of actions, the rights and obligations of the individuals involved, and the ethical principles that are pertinent to the situation. In this regard, ethical sensitivity precedes ethical judgment. Moreover, an individual's ethical sensitivity determines to a significant extent the range and boundary of his or her ability to make appropriate ethical judgments. The Four Component Model has been used extensively in the study of professional ethics and in the design, development and assessment of programs geared toward professional ethics training and education. It is only relatively recently that it has begun to be used in the study of the responsible conduct of research (RCR). In recent years, two instruments for measuring ethical sensitivity in science and engineering have been developed, namely, the Test of Ethical Sensitivity in Science and Engineering (TESSE) developed by Borenstein, et al.6 and the Test for Ethical Sensitivity in Science (TESS) by Clarkeburn.7 Although both investigated ethical sensitivity to issues arising from out of science and engineering, neither focused primarily on assessing ethical sensitivity of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) researchers to the responsible conduct of research.
机译:道德行为的休息开发,并应用到职业道德的Bebeau等“四个组件模型”认为,道德行为是四个因素的结果:(1)道德敏感性,(2)道德判断,(3)道德动机和承诺,和(4)的伦理字符和能力。在道德教育中的科学与工程(Eese(伊塞))领域的大多数理论和教学研究都集中在道德判断。显著,相对较少的工作已经在道德敏感性做过Eese(伊塞)即使道德敏感性提供了一个单独的混凝土考虑在该人让伦理判断的范围内。伦理敏感度决定个人在任何情况下的道德问题是什么危在旦夕,行动可能带来的后果,权利和有关个人的义务,并有相关的情况的伦理原则识别能力。在这一点上,道德敏感性先伦理判断。此外,个人的伦理灵敏度确定一个显著程度的范围和边界的他或她作出适当的伦理判断能力。四组件模型已经在职业道德的研究,并在对职业道德培训和教育的各项方案的设计,开发和评估中广泛使用。这只是最近,它已经开始在研究(RCR)的负责行为的研究中使用。近年来,两种仪器,用于测量科学和工程伦理敏感度已经被开发,即通过鲍仁斯坦,等[6]和科学(测试的道德敏感性TESS开发道德敏感性科学与工程(泰斯)的测试)由Clarkeburn.7虽然这两个调查从出科学与工程中出现的问题的道德敏感性,既不主要侧重于评估STEM的道德敏感性(科学,技术,工程和数学)研究人员研究的负责任的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号