首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Multimedia Technology >Study of energy conservation between natural and mechanical ventilation in subtropical classroom
【24h】

Study of energy conservation between natural and mechanical ventilation in subtropical classroom

机译:亚热带教室中自然机械通气能节能研究

获取原文

摘要

Energy consumption in subtropical classroom is different between natural ventilation and mechanical ventilation. Energy conservation is related with occupants' thermal comfort in these two ventilation systems. This study proposed an electronic questionnaire and instruments to facilitate the continuous monitoring of the state of thermal comfort to investigate the satisfaction level of thermal comfort in the classroom. The investigated results show the clothing value (clo.) in 0.7 is the mean value. When the clo. is smaller than 0.7, the thermal comfort temperature range is between 22.0°C to 28.4°C in the natural ventilation and the range is between 24.8°C to 27.4°C in the mechanical ventilation (hot day). Besides, the thermal comfort temperature range is between 20.7°C to 23.3°C in the natural ventilation and the range is between 20.8°C to 25.4°C in the mechanical ventilation while the clo. is grater than 0.7 (cold day). The temperature range difference means the thermal comfort range of occupants in the hot day is widely and the temperature of natural ventilation is 1°C higher than it in mechanical ventilaion. The analysis of the maxima thermal comfort temperature in natural ventilation in 28.4°C is higher than it in mechnical ventilation in 27.4°C and it is also higher than ASHREA standar 55 2004 in 26°C. It means the energy conservation in 6% (1°C) between natural ventilation and mechanical ventilation in the classroom of subtopical area and it also conservs 14.4% (2.4°C) with ASHREA standar 55. Based on this analysis, this study finds the best solution for energy conservation between natural and mechnical ventilation.
机译:亚热带教室的能量消耗在自然通风和机械通风之间存在差异。节能与这两个通风系统中的乘员热舒适性有关。本研究提出了一种电子问卷和仪器,以促进对热舒适状态的不断监测,以研究教室中热舒适度的满意度。研究结果显示了0.7中的衣物值(CLO。)是平均值。当CLO。小于0.7,热舒适温度范围在22.0°C至28.4°C之间,在自然通风中,机械通风(炎热日)的范围在24.8°C至27.4°C之间。此外,热舒适温度范围在自然通气中的20.7°C至23.3°C之间,在CLO的同时,机械通风的范围在20.8°C至25.4°C之间。刨叶而不是0.7(寒冷的日子)。温度范围差意味着炎热的一天中的乘员的热舒适度范围广泛,自然通风的温度比机械通气中的温度高于1°C。在28.4°C的自然通风中的最大热舒适温度分析高于27.4°C的机电通风中的高于27.4°C的通风。在26°C中也高于ASHREA Standar 55。它意味着在椎间波特地区的教室中的自然通风和机械通风之间的6%(1°C)的节能和机械通风,它还在Ashrea Standar 55中节约14.4%(2.4°C)。根据该分析,该研究发现了天然和机械通风之间的节能解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号