首页> 外文会议>IEEE/IPSJ International Symposium on Applications and the Internet >An Analysis on Premium Value of Moral Right of Author in Japanese Copyright Law: Based on Intellectual Property High Court Judge from 2005 to 2010
【24h】

An Analysis on Premium Value of Moral Right of Author in Japanese Copyright Law: Based on Intellectual Property High Court Judge from 2005 to 2010

机译:日本版权法德国道德权益溢价分析:以知识产权高等法院判断从2005年到2010年

获取原文

摘要

Digital contents are widely distributed over the Internet, as they are less in transferring cost and more in user-friendliness than previous contents confined in real media. This situation has caused increased discussion and conflict of interest between stakeholders of digital contents, especially between contents holders and distributors. For contents holders' side, moral right of author in copyright law is a powerful tool for insisting distribution control of their contents, including the prohibition of distribution. On the contrary, distributors appealed face the risk under this moral right of author in copyright law. Therefore, concrete interpretation of moral right of author in copyright law is critical for stable settlement of such disputes. However, interpretation of moral right of author in copyright law has shown variations, and there are few researches in this field. In order to clarify interpretation of copyright law, I calculated premium value of moral right of author from the viewpoint of Law and Economics. I analyzed nine cases of compensation judge in Intellectual Property High Court Judge in Japan between 2005 and 2010 as a preliminary research. Based in the nine judges, I compared calculated damages by moral right of author and property right. I am going to improve the research framework toward analyzing all Japanese final judgments between 1997 and 2010.
机译:数字内容广泛分布在互联网上,因为它们的转移成本较少,用户友好性比在真实媒体中限制的先前内容更少。这种情况导致了数字内容利益攸关方之间的讨论和利益冲突,特别是内容持有人和经销商之间。对于内容持有人的一方,版权法中作者的道德权利是一个强大的工具,用于坚持其内容的分配控制,包括禁止分配。相反,分销商上诉面临着作者版权法的这种道德权利的风险。因此,有权法中作者道德权利的具体解释对于稳定解决此类争端至关重要。但是,批量法中作者道德权利的解释表明了变化,这一领域几乎没有研究。为了澄清版权法的解释,从法律和经济学的角度计算了作者道德权利的优质价值。我在2005年至2010年期间分析了日本知识产权高等法院法官的九个赔偿法官作为初步研究。基于九名法官,我将作者和财产权的道德权利进行了比较计算损害。我将改善1997年至2010年期间所有日本判断的研究框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号