首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving >Initial and east cave breakthrough events at Palabora Mining Company
【24h】

Initial and east cave breakthrough events at Palabora Mining Company

机译:Palabora矿业公司的首字母突破突破事件

获取原文

摘要

Understanding cave induced seismicity is important to better understanding the processes of block cave mining. This seismicity is a natural process indicating that the cave is progressing and is connected with rock mass fracturing ahead of the undercut and propagating cave. The space and time distribution of seismicity, as well as changes in their source parameters over time, are directly associated with what is happening in the rock mass around the cave and underground mining infrastructure. The initial cave breakthrough into the overlying open pit took place in May 2004 while the east breakthrough took place during the months of May and June 2008. There is a great deal of similarity as regards stress changes (as-indicated by the energy index time histories), migration of seismicity, seismic energy release as well as seismic deformation patterns, with respect to the two breakthrough events. There are also some differences but they are easy to explain as the initial breakthrough took place 25 months after the stress caving process was initiated while in case of the east breakthrough, this time span had increased by a further four years. The continuous caving process during these four additional years had to significantly change the conditions of the rock mass around the cave that resulted in these differences. The energy index time histories for the two breakthrough events are very similar, indicating a stress increase prior to the breakthrough with a rapid stress release post-breakthrough. The main differences relate to the stress levels. Based on the energy index time histories the stress levels prior to the initial breakthrough were higher than those prior to the east breakthrough. The rapid stress release period in both cases was about six times shorter than the period during which the stresses were high. In both cases the pillar failure, and thereafter the breakthrough, resulted in major changes in the stress patterns around the mine. After the failure of the crown pillar larger size seismic energy releases started to appear below the extraction level. When the east pillar failed and broke through there were also some larger seismic energy releases taking place below the extraction level. In both cases the two breakthrough events resulted in an increase in the seismic hazard. The analysis presented shows that not only can seismic data analysis be successfully used to monitor the caving process, but also confirms the reliability of the process.
机译:了解洞穴诱导的地震性对更好地理解块洞穴挖掘的过程非常重要。这种地震性是一种自然过程,表明洞穴正在进行,并与底切和繁殖洞穴前方的岩体压裂连接。地震性的空间和时间分布以及它们的源参数随时间的变化,与洞穴和地下采矿基础设施周围的岩石质量发生的情况直接相关。在2004年5月,初始洞穴突破持续的露天坑,而东部突破在2008年5月和6月6月的几个月内发生了很大的相似性(能源指数时间历史),迁移地震性,地震能量释放以及地震变形图案,相对于两个突破事件。还有一些差异,但它们很容易被解释,因为在东方突破的情况下,在应力崩塌过程中发生了25个月后发生的最初突破,这次时间跨度增加了4年。在这四个额外数年内的连续塌陷过程必须显着改变洞穴周围的岩石质量的条件,导致这些差异。两个突破事件的能量指数时间历史非常相似,表明在突破前的突破前的应力增加,并且突破突破。主要差异与压力水平有关。基于能量指数时间历史,初始突破前的应力水平高于东方突破前的应力水平。两种情况下的快速应激释放期比应力高的时段短大约六倍。在两种情况下,支柱失败,此后的突破导致矿井周围应力模式的重大变化。在冠支柱的失败之后,较大尺寸的地震能量释放开始出现在提取水平以下。当东柱失效并突破时,还在提取水平以下发生一些较大的地震能量释放。在这两种情况下,两个突破事件导致地震危害增加。提出的分析表明,不仅可以成功地使用地震数据分析来监测塌陷过程,还证实了该过程的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号