首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference >Comparing the Use of a Graphical Programming Language To a Traditional Text-based Language To Learn Programming Concepts in a First-year Course
【24h】

Comparing the Use of a Graphical Programming Language To a Traditional Text-based Language To Learn Programming Concepts in a First-year Course

机译:将图形编程语言的使用与传统文本语言的使用进行比较,以在一年的课程中学习编程概念

获取原文

摘要

The research study sought to compare whether students can learn programming concepts using a graphical programming language instead of a text-based language. A small group of students was taught their first programming course using LabVIEW while the control group was using C/C++. One result showed that the C/C++ students (control group) had slightly better performance (10%) on equivalent final examination problems than the LabVIEW students. A second result showed that both groups of students performed equally in MATLAB programming exercises - their 'second' programming language. A third result compared the programming beliefs of the pilot and control groups with the instructors' beliefs. The beliefs survey was administered at the beginning and end of the quarter. The pilot group of students exhibited a shift to more expert-like beliefs. This paper provides details about the processes and problems used in this investigation. The work described here began in early 2007 and was completed in 2008. This project was funded by the National Instruments Foundation.
机译:该研究寻求比较学生是否可以使用图形编程语言而不是基于文本的语言学习编程概念。在使用C / C ++的控制组使用时,使用LabVIEW教授一小组学生的第一个编程课程。一个结果表明,C / C ++学生(对照组)比LabVIEW学生在等效最终检查问题上具有稍好的性能(10%)。第二个结果表明,两组学生在Matlab编程练习中同样进行了 - 他们的“第二次”编程语言。第三次结果与导师信仰的试点和控制组的编程信念与比较。信仰调查是在本季度开始和结束时管理的。试点集团的学生表现出转变为更专业的信仰。本文提供了有关本调查中使用的过程和问题的详细信息。这里描述的工作始于2007年初,并于2008年完成。该项目由国家文书基金会资助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号