首页> 外文会议>Wichita Aviation Technology Congress and Exhibition >Having 5000 Destinations in the Modern U.S. Airways System
【24h】

Having 5000 Destinations in the Modern U.S. Airways System

机译:在现代美国航空系统中拥有5000个目的地

获取原文

摘要

Experience in recent years has demonstrated the inadequacy of the present U.S. Airways System. This paper assumes the adoption of one promising solution - the use of a few very large airports (which will be termed Super Regionals in the paper), widely dispersed across the country and not necessarily associated with any given city, and served by equally large air transports, something like the Boeing 777 or Airbus A380, providing the movement of the largest number of passengers, and cargo, between distant points. Air transport to and from these likely remote large airports and other airports would be accomplished by a variety of types and sizes of airplane, dependent on the traffic density to the given destination. This paper focuses on the one type of "other airplane" that could open up the system to include 5000 locations, this being the nominal figure for active airports in the U.S. with runways of 2000 foot length or over. Runways of this small size would also be located at the Super Regional airports but well away from those runways serving large airplanes. This class of small airplane additionally would operate in the system at much lower altitudes so as not to interfere with the flight paths of the larger airplanes, and the payload could be passengers, cargo/packages or both. Gust alleviation provisions could be added where necessary to improve comfort in this more turbulent portion of the atmosphere. Three different approaches (not mutually exclusive) for providing this short field service are compared for trip time performance, direct operating costs, and operational characteristics: a very conventional configuration (call it a large Model 172), a configuration with high lift Boundary Layer Control (BLC, circa 1955, with variations) and one more recent manifestation of Circulation Control called the PowerWing, using a dedicated engine to provide all internal air flow. (The last is the "control" to which the others are compared.) As developed here all three representative models would carry 15 passengers and have cruise speeds in the general range of 200 to 250 mph, suitable for the short distances they would fly. The conventional and PowerWing designs are of similar performance and cost, while the Boundary Layer Control airplane offers higher cruising speeds but balancing higher operating costs. The speed performance of the BLC configuration provides a substantial advantage for trip legs of 350 miles or more. The discussion of the airways system is expanded to consider world-wide applications.
机译:近年来的经验表明了本发明的美国航空系统的不足。本文假设采用了一个有希望的解决方案 - 使用一些非常大的机场(将被称为纸上的超级区域),广泛分散在全国范围内,不一定与任何特定的城市相关联,并由同样大的空气提供服务运输,像波音777或空中客车A380一样,提供最大数量的乘客和货物的运动,遥远的点。来自这些可能的远程大型机场和其他机场的航空运输将通过各种类型和尺寸的飞机来实现,从而取决于给定目的地的交通密度。本文重点介绍了可以打开系统以包括5000个地点的“其他飞机”,这是美国活跃机场的标称人物。跑道为2000英尺长度长度。此小尺寸的跑道也将位于超级区域机场,但远离那些服务大型飞机的跑道。这类小型飞机还在系统中以低得多的高度操作,以便不干扰较大的飞机的飞行路径,有效载荷可以是乘客,货物/包装或两者。在必要时可以添加阵风缓解规定,以提高大气的这种湍流部分的舒适度。比较三种不同的方法(不相互排斥),用于提供这种短场服务,以进行驾驶时间性能,直接运营成本和操作特性:非常传统的配置(称为大型172),一种具有高升力边界层控制的配置(BLC,大约1955年,有变化)和最近的循环控制的表现,称为PowerWing,使用专用发动机提供所有内部空气流量。 (最后的是其他比较的“控制”。)在这里开发所有三种代表性模型将携带15名乘客,并且在200到250英里/小时的一般范围内具有巡航速度,适合他们飞行的短距离。传统和PowerWing设计具有类似的性能和成本,而边界层控制飞机具有更高的巡航速度,但平衡了更高的运营成本。 BLC配置的速度性能为350英里或更长时间的跳闸腿提供了大量优势。扩展了对气道系统的讨论,以考虑全球应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号