首页> 外文会议>IFIP TC 8 WG 8.6 International Working Conference >15 THE VIEWS OF EXPERTS ON THE CURRENT STATE OF AGILE METHOD TAILORING
【24h】

15 THE VIEWS OF EXPERTS ON THE CURRENT STATE OF AGILE METHOD TAILORING

机译:15对当前敏捷方法剪裁状态的专家意见

获取原文

摘要

As stated in the conference theme, the failure of information systems and information technology projects remains stubbornly high. Agile methods have recently emerged as a new and seemingly popular alternative approach to systems development. Purveyors of these methods claim they solve many of the problems that have plagued the field for over 40 years, and there is now anecdotal evidence to suggest that these benefits are being realized and that diffusion of agile methods is rapidly increasing. However, a key factor in the diffusion of any technology or method is its ability to be customized. Innovative customization, tailoring, and fragmentation of systems development methods are viewed by many as a necessary step to avoid project failure like so many projects in the past. The ability to tailor any method is considered critically important given the complex and unique nature of each and every ISD environment, and in particular, one would logically expect that a method labeled as agile should be malleable. However, it is still unclear whether agile methods are amenable to tailoring. On one hand, purveyors of these methods advocate and often recommend tailoring. On the other hand, however, tailoring of agile methods has been described as a potential minefield due to the fact that their practices are interconnected, synergistic, and socially embedded in the development effort. This study develops a better understanding of agile method tailoring in practice through semi-structured delphi interviews with 40 ISD expert practitioners and academics. The study sought to ascertain their opinion on the tailoring of agile methods in general, and then honed in on specific critical success/actors (CSFs) of tailoring, namely built-in contingency, clear rationale behind method practices, independence of method practices, and disciplined and educated tailoring of practices. The study found that these factors are largely ignored by the agile method movement except in rare instances, and concludes with a set of recommendations for agile method creators and users to ensure agile methods experience higher diffusion rates than at present.
机译:正如会议主题所述,信息系统和信息技术项目的失败仍然顽固地稳固。敏捷方法最近被出现为系统开发的一种新的和看似受欢迎的替代方法。这些方法的供应商声称他们解决了40多年来困扰该领域的许多问题,现在有轶事证据表明正在实现这些益处,并且敏捷方法的扩散迅速增加。然而,任何技术或方法的扩散的关键因素是其定制的能力。许多人认为系统开发方法的创新定制,剪裁和碎片化,以避免过去的项目失败等必要步骤。考虑到每个和每个ISD环境的复杂性和独特性,并且特别地,鉴于每个方法的复杂性和唯一性质,逻辑上预期的能力将被认为是至关重要的。但是,尚不清楚敏捷方法是否适合剪裁。一方面,这些方法的供应商倡导和经常建议剪裁。然而,另一方面,由于他们的实践是互联,协同和社会嵌入在开发工作中的实践,因此被描述为敏捷方法的裁缝被描述为潜在的雷区。本研究通过半结构化的Delphi访谈产生了更好地了解敏捷方法,通过半结构化的Delphi访谈与40个ISD专家从业者和学术界进行裁剪。该研究试图确定他们对一般敏捷方法剪裁的意见,然后磨决了裁缝的特定关键成功/行动者(CSF),即内置的应急,清晰的方法实践,方法实践的独立性,以及方法实践的独立性纪律和受过培养的裁缝裁缝。该研究发现,除了罕见的情况之外,这些因素大大忽略了敏捷方法运动,并结束了一组敏捷方法创作者和用户的建议,以确保敏捷方法比目前更高的扩散率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号