【24h】

15 THE VIEWS OF EXPERTS ON THE CURRENT STATE OF AGILE METHOD TAILORING

机译:15敏捷方法定制的最新状态专家的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As stated in the conference theme, the failure of information systems and information technology projects remains stubbornly high. Agile methods have recently emerged as a new and seemingly popular alternative approach to systems development. Purveyors of these methods claim they solve many of the problems that have plagued the field for over 40 years, and there is now anecdotal evidence to suggest that these benefits are being realized and that diffusion of agile methods is rapidly increasing. However, a key factor in the diffusion of any technology or method is its ability to be customized. Innovative customization, tailoring, and fragmentation of systems development methods are viewed by many as a necessary step to avoid project failure like so many projects in the past. The ability to tailor any method is considered critically important given the complex and unique nature of each and every ISD environment, and in particular, one would logically expect that a method labeled as agile should be malleable. However, it is still unclear whether agile methods are amenable to tailoring. On one hand, purveyors of these methods advocate and often recommend tailoring. On the other hand, however, tailoring of agile methods has been described as a potential minefield due to the fact that their practices are interconnected, synergistic, and socially embedded in the development effort. This study develops a better understanding of agile method tailoring in practice through semi-structured delphi interviews with 40 ISD expert practitioners and academics. The study sought to ascertain their opinion on the tailoring of agile methods in general, and then honed in on specific critical success/actors (CSFs) of tailoring, namely built-in contingency, clear rationale behind method practices, independence of method practices, and disciplined and educated tailoring of practices. The study found that these factors are largely ignored by the agile method movement except in rare instances, and concludes with a set of recommendations for agile method creators and users to ensure agile methods experience higher diffusion rates than at present.
机译:如会议主题所述,信息系统和信息技术项目的失败率仍然很高。敏捷方法最近已成为一种新的,似乎很受欢迎的系统开发替代方法。这些方法的提供者声称,他们解决了困扰该领域40多年的许多问题,现在有传闻证据表明这些方法的好处正在实现,并且敏捷方法的传播正在迅速增加。但是,任何技术或方法普及的关键因素是其定制能力。许多人都认为,创新的定制,定制和系统开发方法的分散化是避免项目失败的必要步骤,就像过去的许多项目一样。考虑到每个ISD环境的复杂性和独特性,量身定制任何方法的能力都至关重要,尤其是,从逻辑上来说,人们应该期望标记为敏捷的方法应具有延展性。但是,仍然不清楚敏捷方法是否适合定制。一方面,这些方法的提倡者经常提倡裁缝。但是,另一方面,由于敏捷方法的实践相互关联,相互协作并且在开发工作中具有社会根基,因此将其描述为潜在的雷区。通过与40位ISD专家从业人员和学者进行的半结构化delphi访谈,本研究对实践中的敏捷方法定制有了更好的理解。该研究旨在确定他们对整体敏捷方法的看法,然后针对具体的关键成功方法/关键因素(CSF)进行修整,即内置的偶然性,方法实践背后的明确理由,方法实践的独立性以及具有纪律性和教育性的实践剪裁。该研究发现,除了极少数情况外,敏捷方法的发展很大程度上忽略了这些因素,并为敏捷方法的创建者和用户提供了一系列建议,以确保敏捷方法的扩散率高于目前。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号