首页> 外文会议>Colloquium on Particle-Laden Flow >DNS study of local-equilibrium models in dilute particle-laden turbulent pipe flows
【24h】

DNS study of local-equilibrium models in dilute particle-laden turbulent pipe flows

机译:稀薄粒子湍流管流动局部平衡模型的DNS研究

获取原文

摘要

A two-fluid closure model, commonly used in engineering simulations, is the drift-velocity model of Simonin. In this work, this model is evaluated for dilute particle-laden pipe flows, using Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) with particle tracking. The simulations were performed with both heavy and light particles (particle relaxation-times of τ_2~+ = 100 and τ_2~+ = 10, respectively) and with reflecting and absorbing walls as the boundary conditions for the particles, resulting in four different cases. For all the cases, except the combination of heavy particles and absorbing walls, from a pragmatic point of view, the assumptions of local-equilibrium and homogeneous turbulence seem to hold. For the drift-velocity two models were evaluated: (i) a simple Schmidt-number model, and (ii) a more advanced drift-tensor model. From an engineering perspective, for light particles with reflecting walls the Schmidt-number model appears to be the best choice. However, when the particles are heavier or when the walls are absorbing, the more advanced drift-tensor model gives better results. For these cases, provided that there exists good closure models for the time-scales and particle-fluid velocity correlations, a drift-tensor model could be a better option.
机译:双流体闭合模型,在工程模拟常用,是西莫南的漂移速度模型。在这项工作中,这种模式是为稀带粒管流评价,使用直接数值模拟(DNS)与粒子追踪。该模拟用重链和轻颗粒(颗粒松弛倍的τ_2〜+ = 100和τ_2〜+ = 10,分别地),并用反射和吸收壁作为用于粒子的边界条件,从而导致四种不同情况。对于所有的情况下,除了重粒子和吸收壁的组合,从实际的观点来看,局部平衡且均匀的湍流的假设似乎保持。为漂移速度两个模型进行评价:(ⅰ)一个简单的施密特数模型,和(ii)一种更先进的漂移张量模型。从工程的角度看,对于轻粒子与反射壁施密特数模型似乎是最好的选择。然而,当颗粒较重或当墙壁吸收,更先进的漂移张量模型给出了更好的结果。对于这些情况,提供了存在的时间尺度和颗粒流体速度的相关性良好的封闭模式,漂移张量模型可能是一个更好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号