首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference Exposition >Moving From Pipeline Thinking to Understanding Pathways: Findings from the Academic Pathways Study of Engineering Undergraduates
【24h】

Moving From Pipeline Thinking to Understanding Pathways: Findings from the Academic Pathways Study of Engineering Undergraduates

机译:从管道思考理解途径:从工程大学生的学术途径研究中的研究结果

获取原文

摘要

The Academic Pathways Study (APS) is part of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), an NSF-funded higher education Center for Learning and Teaching that is in its sixth year. The APS consists of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies of engineering students' learning experience and the transition to work. APS research questions are focused on student skills, identity, education and the transition to the workplace to investigate what skills engineering graduates are bringing with them into an increasingly complex world. The study relies on multiple methods and data sources including surveys, structured interviews, semi-structured interviews, an engineering design task, academic transcripts, and exit interviews. Overall, the preliminary findings to date indicate a large variation in student pathways and institutional influences. A range of factors affect the educational pathways traveled by engineering students: reasons for their choice of major, heavy workloads and competition in their programs, little vision into engineering in the first two years when they are taking math and science courses outside of engineering departments. Reasons for leaving include a fear of losing scholarship support (that dictates choice of classes), lack of confidence in math and science skills, and the perception that engineering is too "narrow" a field. Reasons for staying include sponsorship of student strengths and skills, satisfaction of completing a rigorous course of study, the desire to contribute to the public good, and a vision of the potential for a comfortable lifestyle following graduation. In many cases, students have very different perceptions of diversity and its role in their education. Some of these factors affect the quality of the student experience, whereas others affect commitment to the field. Many of these factors influence men and women in different ways and change over time.
机译:学术途径研究(APS)是工程教育(CAEE)进步中心的一部分,这是一个NSF资助的高等教育中心,用于学习和教学中的第六年。 APS由工程学生学习经验和转型工作的纵向和横断面研究组成。 APS研究问题侧重于学生技能,身份,教育和向工作场所的过渡,调查技能工程毕业生正在与他们带入越来越复杂的世界。该研究依赖于多种方法和数据来源,包括调查,结构化访谈,半结构性访谈,工程设计任务,学术成绩单和退出访谈。总体而言,迄今的初步调查结果表明学生途径和制度影响的大变异。一系列因素影响了工程学生旅行的教育途径:他们选择的主要,繁重工作量和竞争中的原因,在他们在工程部门以外的数学和科学课程时,在前两年的愿景很少。留下的原因包括担心失去奖学金支持(决定课程的选择),缺乏对数学和科学技能的信心,并且工程过于“狭隘”的看法。入住原因包括赞助学生的优势和技能,满足完成严格的学习过程,为公众提供贡献的愿望,以及毕业后舒适生活方式的潜力。在许多情况下,学生对多样性的看法非常不同,以及其在教育中的作用。其中一些因素影响了学生经历的质量,而其他因素则影响对该领域的承诺。其中许多因素以不同的方式影响男性和女性并随着时间的推移而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号