首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference Exposition >RESISTING NEOLIBERALISM IN GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
【24h】

RESISTING NEOLIBERALISM IN GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING

机译:抵抗全球发展工程中的新自由主义

获取原文

摘要

In recent years we have seen an explosion of interest in global development engineering on our campuses. Driven by a range of goals including addressing basic human needs, working to end poverty, or providing students with cross-cultural design experience in preparation for careers in a globalized economy, numerous small-scale engineering projects have proliferated in developing countries, either driven by or with participation from U.S. engineers and engineering students. Many different models have been employed to this end, curricular and co-curricular, in collaboration with foreign governments, educational institutions or non-governmental organizations, with entrepreneurial, sustainable, appropriate technology and/or community-based approaches to design. These engineering projects are occurring in the context of globalization and broader economic development efforts. It is important that we in the engineering community are aware of and participate in discussions around the underlying assumptions and values that accompany these trends, to learn how our efforts are (perhaps unwittingly) influenced by and even a part of them. In particular, at the heart of many development efforts lie economic and policy perspectives that are critiqued internationally and domestically as neoliberalism; as engineers learn about neoliberalism we can clarify our stances in relation to it as we undertake global development work. As part of this conversation, I take the position that engineers ought to resist neoliberalism in global development engineering. Although the definition itself is contested, here I define neoliberal approaches to development as those that place ultimate faith in free markets and rely on what amount to "trickle down" theories to predict redistribution of wealth. Coupled with and following from this economic approach are policy perspectives that include opposition to collective bargaining, removal of regulations on industry and trade, minimization of governmental support for social services, and privatization of public goods such as clean water. Responsibility shifts from communities or public governance to individuals. How can engineers and engineering students undertaking engineering projects for global development resist neoliberalism? Are there effective models of technological development that depart from - or transform - neoliberal frameworks? What can we learn from the community-based learning literature that may be adapted for work in developing communities? Through a series of case studies, we explore models for engineering development projects and student participation in them. Potential pitfalls are examined, and the implications for global development efforts within engineering education are discussed.
机译:近年来,我们已经看到了对我们校园的全球发展工程感兴趣的兴趣。由一系列目标驱动,包括解决基本的人类需求,致力于结束贫困,或为学生提供跨文化设计经验,以准备全球化经济的职业,发展中国家的大量小型工程项目增殖,无论是驱动的或参加美国工程师和工程学生。许多不同的型号已被聘为此目的,课程和共同课程,与外国政府,教育机构或非政府组织合作,具有创业,可持续,技术和/或基于社区的设计方法。这些工程项目在全球化和更广泛的经济发展工作中发生。重要的是,在工程社区中,我们都知道并参与伴随这些趋势的潜在假设和价值观的讨论,了解我们的努力(也许不知不觉)受到它们的影响。特别是,在许多发展努力的核心,在国际上批评的经济和政策观点,以国际和国内作为新自由主义;由于工程师了解新自由主义,我们可以在我们进行全球发展工作时澄清我们的立场。作为这次谈话的一部分,我采取了工程师应抵御全球发展工程中的新自由主义的职位。虽然定义本身是有争议的,但在这里,我将新自由主义方法定义为那些将最终信仰放置在自由市场的那些,依赖于“涓涓细流”理论,以预测财富的再分配。从这种经济方针加上和之后是政策观点,包括反对集体谈判,拆除行业和贸易条例,最大限度地减少社会服务的政府支持,以及公共物品的私有化,如清洁水。责任从社区或公共治理转向个人。工程师和工程学生如何承担全球发展的工程项目抵抗新自由主义?有效的技术发展模式 - 或转换 - 新自由主义框架?我们可以从基于社区的学习文学中学到什么,这些文献可能适用于发展社区的工作?通过一系列案例研究,我们探索工程开发项目和学生参与的模型。探讨了潜在的陷阱,讨论了对工程教育中的全球发展努力的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号