首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference Exposition >An Investigation of Gaps in Design Process Learning: Is there a Missing Link between Breadth and Depth?
【24h】

An Investigation of Gaps in Design Process Learning: Is there a Missing Link between Breadth and Depth?

机译:设计过程学习中差距的调查:广度和深度之间有缺失的联系吗?

获取原文

摘要

Teaching 'design' is an integral part of undergraduate engineering preparation. Most four years engineering programs include a first year course focused on the engineering design process where students are exposed to the wide range of issues that must be considered with regard to the 'real life' activity of designing a product or a process. These courses typically culminate in a team report describing the breadth of information accumulated and considered to arrive at the final recommended design. However, at the first year, students typically lack the knowledge to perform any meaningful analysis on their product or process, but rather focus their activities on the less 'technical' but equally important aspects of the design, such as consumer needs, economic impact, safety and design communication. Once students leave their first year, the curriculum focus typically turns almost exclusively to teaching the analytical tools students will need as working engineers to accomplish innovative design, with far less emphasis on the broad design issues that extend beyond the analysis. Anecdotal evidence shows that students do not connect the newly acquired analytical knowledge with the design process, creating a design learning gap. When students return to a design emphasis in the senior year capstone course, they are expected to bridge this gap by synthesizing the broad engineering design understanding from the first year with their analytical depth gained in the second and third years to produce unique engineering design solutions. Can small but effective changes be made in the second and third year to improve this model of design learning that could help students more easily make the connection in the senior year between the broad design learning from three years earlier and their newly developed analytical skills? Through a joint effort involving faculty from Engineering Design, Engineering Mechanics, Civil Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering, we hope to answer just that question.
机译:教学“设计”是本科工程准备的一个组成部分。大多数四年的工程方案包括第一年课程,专注于工程设计过程,学生接触到在设计产品或过程的“现实生活”活动方面必须考虑的广泛问题。这些课程通常在团队报告中达到高潮,描述累计的信息的广度并考虑到最终推荐的设计。但是,在第一年,学生通常缺乏对其产品或过程进行任何有意义的分析,而是将他们的活动集中在较少的“技术”,而是对消费者需求,经济影响,经济影响等较少的“技术”的活动集中。安全和设计沟通。一旦学生离开他们的第一年,课程焦点通常几乎完全转向教学,学生需要作为工作工程师来完成创新设计的,远不重视延伸超出分析的广泛设计问题。轶事证据表明,学生不会通过设计过程连接新获得的分析知识,创造了设计学习差距。当学生在高年度Capstone课程重新设计重点时,他们预计将通过在第一年和第三年中获得的分析深度来综合广泛的工程设计理解来弥合这一差距,以生产独特的工程设计解决方案。在第二年和第三年度可以进行小而有效的变化,以改善这种设计学习模式,可以帮助学生更容易地在高级设计学习的高年前从3年前获得联系,他们新开发的分析技能?通过涉及工程设计,工程力学,土木工程和机械工程学院的联合努力,我们希望回答这个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号