【24h】

ADDRESSING POST-HARVEST LOSSES IN ARTISANAL FISHERIES: SOME KEY CONSIDERATIONS

机译:解决手工渔业的收获后损失:一些关键考虑因素

获取原文

摘要

While artisanal fisheries are said to incur high post-harvest losses, with data from 15% to 75% (FAO, Mills, Moes) commonly quoted, in many cases the key factors behind these figures have not been meaningfully clarified. This makes planning and implementation of effective loss reduction strategies difficult, and risks wasting already scarce development resources.Reducing post-harvest losses may be addressed through technical or non-technical measures. Solutions might be within or outside the fisheries sector and therefore an effective loss reduction strategy rests upon a systematic loss assessment and a holisticapproach to identification and planning of the interventions. This requires that all stakeholders (government officers, development practitioners, policy-makers and researchers, etc.) have a common understanding of these considerations that are elaborated on in this paper. These are mainly the terminology about the type of loss, the stepwise approach to quantifying the losses, the participatory approach, the issue of quality and spoilage within post-harvest loss assessment, the non-existence of universal established solutions to post-harvest losses, paying attention to existing coping strategies and to the socio-economic context within the fisheries.
机译:虽然手工渔业据说遭受高收获后损失,但在许多情况下,常规引用的15%至75%(粮农组织,米尔斯,MOES)的数据尚未有意义地澄清这些数字背后的关键因素。这使得规划和实施有效损失减少策略困难,浪费风险已经稀缺发展资源。可以通过技术或非技术措施解决收获后损失。解决方案可能在渔业部门内外或外部,因此有效的损失减少策略依赖于系统丧失评估和洞穴识别和规划干预措施。这要求所有利益攸关方(政府官员,发展从业者,政策制定者和研究人员等)对本文阐述的这些考虑因素具有共同的理解。这些主要是关于损失类型的术语,量化损失的逐步方法,参与性方法,在收获后损失评估内的质量和腐败问题,不存在普遍建立的解决方案,对收获后的损失,关注现有的应对策略以及渔业内的社会经济环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号