首页> 外文会议>Asia-Pacific Drying Conference >A COMPARISON OF SOME MATHEMATICAL MODELS USEDFOR THE PREDICTION OF MASS TRANSFER KINETICS INOSMOTIC DEHYDRATION OF FRUITS
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF SOME MATHEMATICAL MODELS USEDFOR THE PREDICTION OF MASS TRANSFER KINETICS INOSMOTIC DEHYDRATION OF FRUITS

机译:用于预测脾脏渗透渗透脱水肿块转移动力学预测的一些数学模型的比较

获取原文

摘要

Mass transfer in osmotic dehydration of fruits at atmospheric pressure has been modeledeither by a phenomenological approach using Crank's model (which is a Fick's lawsolution), or empirically, using models developed from polynomial equations, massbalances, or relations between process variables (i.e. Magee's, Azuara's, and Page'smodels). For all these models, experimental data are required to determine the values oftheir adjustable parameters for specific processing conditions. From a wide variety ofpublished data, the parameters for moisture loss (ML) and solid gain (SG) werecalculated for the above-mentioned models, and a comparison of their correlationcapability was made. Azuara's and Page's models yield better correlations (with meanabsolute errors less than 1.26% for ML and 0.46% for SG) than Magee's and Crank'smodels (with mean absolute errors of up to 2.98% and 1.68% for ML and SG,respectively).
机译:在大气压下渗透果实脱水的渗透脱水已经通过使用曲柄模型(这是Fick的诉讼)或经验使用从多项式方程,分组或过程变量之间的关系(即Magee,Azuara之间的关系的模型来模仿,和page'smodels)。对于所有这些模型,需要实验数据来确定特定处理条件的可调参数的值。从各种广泛的公布数据中,对上述模型的水分损失(m1)和固体增益(SG)的参数,以及其相关性能力的比较。 Azuara和Page的模型产生更好的相关性(对于ML的含量误差小于1.26%,对于SG的0.46%)比Magee和Crank'Scodels(分别为ML和SG的平均绝对误差为2.98%和1.68%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号