首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Science and Technology for Desertification Control >Countermeasures for Desertification:the Social Science Perspective
【24h】

Countermeasures for Desertification:the Social Science Perspective

机译:荒漠化对策:社会科学观点

获取原文

摘要

The term desertification, defined by the UN in 1994, is mainly concerned with natural phenomenon. The definition seems inadequate from the perspective of political and social science. Thus, a definition with consideration for social science is given as follows: desertification is a serial phenomenon involving destruction of vegetation, land degradation or abandonment, worsening of local human living conditions and threat to civilization, all caused by over-loading, over cultivation and/or over-lumbering, due to climate change, increase in population, income inequality and poverty in arid, semi-arid, and semi-humid areas. The worsening of living conditions is a symptom of poverty. Global desertification is a form of "new poverty" on global scale. This "new poverty" is different from the traditional poverty caused by low income and unemployment because even people in high income brackets will experience it from the worsening of all living conditions.
机译:1994年由联合国定义的荒漠化术语主要涉及自然现象。从政治和社会科学的角度来看,定义似乎不足。因此,考虑到社会科学的定义如下:荒漠化是涉及破坏植被,土地退化或遗弃,当地人类生活条件恶化以及文明威胁的串行现象,所有这些都是由过度装载,过度培养和培养/或过度伐,由于气候变化,人口增加,干旱,半干旱和半湿地区的收入不平等和贫困。生活条件恶化是贫困的症状。全球荒漠化是全球规模的“新贫困”的形式。这种“新扶贫”与低收入和失业率引起的传统贫困不同,因为即使高收入支架的人也将从所有生活条件的恶化中遇到它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号