首页> 外文会议>Commodity Flow Survey Conference >Why Regional and State Data Are Not Enough Potential Solutions
【24h】

Why Regional and State Data Are Not Enough Potential Solutions

机译:为什么区域和国家数据不是足够的潜在解决方案

获取原文

摘要

The Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) remains the first, best, and, frankly only, gateway to understanding freight movements in the United States. Without the creation of the CFS analysts were forced to rely upon anecdotal evidence, expert opinion and suspect data sets. The purpose of mis paper is not to diminish the tremendous accomplishment of the CFS. Without the touchstone of the CFS many analysts (myself included) would just be poking in the dark and reading tea leaves. In the CFS's current manifestation the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) participates as both a value added producer, creating the Freight Analytical Framework (FAF) and Geofreight; and a user, relying upon the CFS, FAF, and Geofreight as primary sources for analytical reports and recommendations to political decision makers. This paper will discuss the DOT uses of the CFS (and related products), deficiencies in the current CFS release formats and products, and solutions to improve the CFS products.
机译:商品流量调查(CFS)仍然是第一个,最佳,坦率地,仅限于美国理解美国货运的门户。未经创建的CFS分析师被迫依靠轶事证据,专家意见和怀疑数据集。 MIS文件的目的不是减少CFS的巨大成就。没有CFS的Thegstone许多分析师(我所包括)只是在黑暗和读茶叶中戳戳。在CFS的当前表现形式中,美国运输部(DOT)作为增值制片人参与,创建运费分析框架(FAF)和地理群体;和用户,依靠CFS,FAF和GeoFreight作为分析报告和政治决策者建议的主要来源。本文将讨论CFS(及相关产品),目前CFS释放格式和产品的缺陷的DOT使用,以及改善CFS产品的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号