首页> 外文会议>Commercial Vehicle Engineering Congress and Exhibition >Comparison of Heavy Truck Foundation Brake Performance Measured With an Inertia Brake Dynamometer and Analyses of Brake Output Responses to Dynamic Pressure Inputs
【24h】

Comparison of Heavy Truck Foundation Brake Performance Measured With an Inertia Brake Dynamometer and Analyses of Brake Output Responses to Dynamic Pressure Inputs

机译:用惯性制动测功机测量重型卡车基础制动性能的比较,并分析了动态压力输入的制动输出响应

获取原文

摘要

In support of NHTSA's studies of heavy truck brake types and their effects on vehicle stopping performance and stability, the NHTSA Vehicle Research and Test Center (VRTC) has evaluated four foundation brake types on their Greening Brake Dynamometer. Several sample assemblies of each type of brake were tested to better understand variability. Braking tests were run under the "Laboratory Test Procedure for FMVSS 121D Air Brake Systems -Dynamometer" (TP-121D-01) procedures. Afterward, the test scope was expanded to include higher speeds and higher severity conditions than those specified Test Procedure. This paper reports on the differences in braking effectiveness between two traditional S-Cam air brake types and two recently introduced Air Disc brake types. Burnish procedure trends are briefly discussed and compared. Responses of the pneumatic brakes to both constant-pressure and dynamic inputs are also compared and discussed. New statistical methods are introduced to compare brake effectiveness over a broad range of pressures.
机译:为了支持NHTSA对重型卡车制动类型的研究及其对车辆停止性能和稳定性的影响,NHTSA车辆研究和测试中心(VRTC)在其绿化制动测功机上评估了四种基础制动类型。测试每种制动器的几种样品组件以更好地理解可变性。在“FMVSS 121D空气制动系统的实验室测试程序”下运行制动试验 - (TP-121D-01)程序。之后,扩展测试范围以包括比指定测试程序更高的速度和更高的严重性条件。本文报告了两种传统的S型凸轮空气制动类型和最近引入的空气盘式制动类型之间制动效率的差异。简要讨论并比较了Burnish Procedure趋势。还比较和讨论了气动制动器对恒定压力和动态输入的反应。引入了新的统计方法以比较广泛压力的制动效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号