首页> 外文会议>Physics Education Research Conference >Beta-Test Data On An Assessment Of Textbook Problem Solving Ability: An Argument For Right/Wrong Grading
【24h】

Beta-Test Data On An Assessment Of Textbook Problem Solving Ability: An Argument For Right/Wrong Grading

机译:关于教科书问题解决能力评估的β-测试数据:右/错误分级的论据

获取原文

摘要

We have developed an assessment of students' ability to solve standard textbook style problems and are cur-rently engaged in the validation and revision process. The assessment covers the topics of force and motion, conserva-tion of momentum and conservation of energy at a level consistent with most calculus-based, introductory physics courses. This tool is discussed in more detail in an accompanying paper by Marx and Cummings. [1] Here we present preliminary beta-test data collected at four schools during the 2009/2010 academic year. Data include both pre- and post-instruction results for introductory physics courses as well as results for physics majors in later years. In addition, we present evidence that right/wrong grading may well be a perfectly acceptable grading procedure for a course-level assessment of this type.
机译:我们已经制定了对学生解决标准教科书样式问题的能力的评估,并在验证和修订过程中进行了影响。评估涵盖了势力和运动的主题,节能的动力和能量保护,在与大多数基于微积分的介绍性物理课程一致的水平上。通过Marx和Cummings在附带的纸张中更详细地讨论了该工具。 [1]在这里,我们在2009/2010学年在四所学校提出初步β-试验数据。数据包括前后介绍物理课程的预先和指令结果,以及后来的物理专业的结果。此外,我们提出了证据表明,正确/错误的分级可能是这种类型的课程级别评估的完全可接受的分级过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号