首页> 外文会议>Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition >Practical Justification for an Empirical Approach to Probabilistic Undeveloped Reserve Bookings In Resource Plays
【24h】

Practical Justification for an Empirical Approach to Probabilistic Undeveloped Reserve Bookings In Resource Plays

机译:资源竞争中概率欠发达预备预备预订的实证方法实际理由

获取原文

摘要

This paper is the third paper in a three part series which collectively presents a new practical method for probabilistic reserve evaluation under the recently released Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting Rules by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (SEC 2009). This paper is focused on a methodology to validate the new stochastic booking method outlined in the first two papers of the series. When major changes are contemplated for key systems within a company it is critical to evaluate those changes prior to implementation. Moving to a new method of reserve evaluation and reporting could potentially have major implications for almost any oil and gas company. Internal uses of the reserve report as well as legal requirements of disclosure to regulatory agencies and governing bodies elevates the need to understand the scope of the modifications before they are adopted. This paper presents an approach wherein the evaluator can test the proposed probabilistic methods against the actual field data. The test is used to predict the repeatability and reliability of the results. In essence, it applies an empirical apporach to insure the technique meets the SEC requirement to be considered a reliable technology. When this approach is conducted over independent units of time and distinct spatial areas the repeatability of the answers supports the robustness and confidence needed to meet the requirements of the Modernized Rules. Theoretical Proved Undeveloped (PUD) bookings were created using the new stochastic method for specific locations for a prior time period; those results were compared to actual post production proved developed producing (PDP) well estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) results for the same locations. Results for a specific case history are presented. The PDP results are in aggregate slightly greater than the aggregated PUD bookings. The new method constitutes a reliable technology and this paper outlines an approach to test the method prior to implementation in a company’s work flow.
机译:本文是三部分系列中的第三篇文章,其在最近发布的石油和交易委员会(SEC)(第二份)(第二份)(第二份)(SEC)上发布了石油和天然气报告规则现代化的概率储备评估的新方法本文集中于一种方法来验证系列前两篇论文中概述的新随机预订方法。当在公司内部的关键系统考虑重大变更时,在实施之前评估这些变更至关重要。迁至新的储备评估和报告方法可能会对几乎任何石油和天然气公司产生重大影响。储备报告的内部用途以及监管机构和理事机构披露的法律要求提升了在通过之前了解修改范围的必要性。本文提出了一种方法,其中评估者可以针对实际现场数据测试所提出的概率方法。该测试用于预测结果的可重复性和可靠性。从本质上讲,它适用一个经验的Apporach来确保技术符合SEC要求被认为是可靠的技术。当这种方法在独立的时间单位和不同的空间区域进行时,答案的可重复性支持满足现代化规则要求所需的稳健性和信心。使用现有时间段的特定位置的新随机方法创建了理论证明的未开发(PUD)预订;这些结果与实际的后期生产进行比较,已被证明产生的(PDP)估计估计的最终恢复(EUR)结果对同一地点。提出了特定情况历史的结果。 PDP结果略大于聚合的PUD预订。新方法构成了可靠的技术,本文概述了在公司工作流程实施之前测试该方法的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号