首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >A Comparative Study of an Architectural Design Course of Two Sections: The Course Impact on the Performance and Continuation of a Major-Assessment Based on Two Design Projects
【24h】

A Comparative Study of an Architectural Design Course of Two Sections: The Course Impact on the Performance and Continuation of a Major-Assessment Based on Two Design Projects

机译:两段建筑设计过程的比较研究:基于两个设计项目的课程对绩效的影响和延续的课程

获取原文

摘要

In a typical semester (Fall/Spring) Architectural Design course, students complete two major architectural design projects. Before students begin work on these two aforementioned projects, students also work on a very small lake cabin drawing, which serve as an introduction in using the basic tools of the Revit Software, but was not considered for this research. The textbook utilized was an SDC Publication textbook entitled Residential Design Using Autodesk Revit (now, 2018). The first project makes use of an SDC publications textbook where students work on constructing a single family residence comprising of a basement, first floor, and second floor. During the latter part of the semester, students are to design and construct their own single floor dwelling for a single family residence. Students are to adhere to instructions for both projects. This is especially important for the second project minimum where building standards or codes are to be adhered to where applicable and emphasized by the instructor. In addition to the lake cabin drawing, Quizzes and other assignments were also assigned but not considered for this research. At the beginning of the Fall 2017 semester, students were to complete questionnaires related to their career choices in the construction industry and course related majors/minors. Towards the end of the semester, a similar questionnaire was issued which evaluated students' experience in the course. The second questionnaire was designed to determine whether or not students' career choices changed or remained the same at the conclusion of the course. The responses from the surveys and data from the two architectural project assessments were compared from both sections to identify whether the students' responses or career choices had an impact on a particular class section performance.
机译:在典型的学期(秋季/春季)建筑设计课程中,学生完成了两个主要的建筑设计项目。在学生开始在这两个上述项目开始工作之前,学生还在一个非常小的湖泊客舱上工作,作为使用Revit软件的基本工具的介绍,但没有考虑过这项研究。使用的教科书是使用Autodesk Revit(现在,2018年)使用Autodesk Revit题为住宅设计的SDC发布教科书。第一个项目利用SDC出版物教科书,学生在建造一个家庭住宅,包括地下室,一楼和二楼。在学期后期,学生将设计并建造自己的单层住宅,为单身家庭住所。学生将遵守两个项目的说明。这对第二个项目最低尤为重要,其中建筑标准或代码应遵守适用并由教师强调的地方。除了湖舱绘图之外,还会分配测验和其他作业,但不考虑这项研究。在2017年秋季开始,学生们要完成与建筑业和课程相关专业/未成年人的职业选择相关的调查问卷。在学期结束时,发出了类似的调查问卷,评估了学生在课程中的经验。第二次调查表旨在确定学生的职业选择是否在课程结束时更改或保持不变。从两个架构项目评估中的调查和数据的响应与两个部分进行了比较,以确定学生的回应或职业选择是否对特定课程部分的绩效产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号