首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Lessons Learned from Changing Content Delivery Methods in Engineering Statics
【24h】

Lessons Learned from Changing Content Delivery Methods in Engineering Statics

机译:从改变工程静验中的内容交付方法的经验教训

获取原文

摘要

This work examines the impact different pedagogical approaches in an engineering statics course had on student learning, long-term retention of material, student interest in their field of study and how the impact differs with gender. During the 2015-2016 academic year, five sections of engineering statics were taught, for a total of approximately 130 students including all sophomore civil and mechanical engineering students along with junior and senior electrical engineering students and some bio-engineering students pursuing a minor in mechanical engineering. Four sections, each taught by different professors, implemented significant pedagogical changes. Course changes incorporated flipped classes, flipped-flipped classes and many hands on activities. One of the professors taught the fifth section as a control group using their normal teaching style that includes more traditional active learning methods like group work, questioning and demonstrations To assess the impact of the pedagogical approaches, the statics concept inventory developed by Paul Steif was used twice during the course to assess pre- then post- course knowledge. The concept inventory was also used to assess long-term retention of a cohort of students one to four months after they finished the course. Results between the control class and the students taught with the inverted model are compared. Students filled out a post-course survey asking for input on activities and videos and how they perceived the course helped them learn and engage in the subject and engineering. Results from this work indicate the specific active learning technique implemented is less important in student learning gains and student engagement than the experience and training of the faculty member in effectively implementing active learning methodologies. Students in all sections showed long-term retention of course topics and had similar preferences in content-delivery methods. Gender differences were striking, with female students gaining significantly to their male counterparts. The results of this study provide insight for other researchers hoping to implement active learning approaches in introductory engineering courses.
机译:这项工作探讨了工程静态课程中的不同教学方法对学生学习,长期保留了物质,学生兴趣在他们的研究领域以及如何与性别不同。在2015-2016学年期间,教授五个工程宿舍,共有大约130名学生,包括所有二年级学生,包括初级和高级电气工程学生和一些生物工程学生在机械中追求未成年人工程。四个部分,每个教授由不同的教授教授,实施了重大的教学改变。课程改变已加入翻转的课程,翻转翻转的课程和许多手的活动。其中一位教授使用他们的正常教学方式教授第五部分作为对照组,其中包括更多传统的积极学习方法,如团体工作,质疑和示范,以评估教学方法的影响,使用保罗Steif开发的统计概念库存在课程中两次评估后期的课程知识。概念库存还用于评估课程完成一到四个月的长期保留一至四个月。比较控制类和与倒置模型教授的学生之间的结果。学生填写了课程调查,要求输入活动和视频以及他们如何认识到课程帮助他们学习和参与主题和工程。这项工作的结果表明,在学生学习收益和学生参与方面所实施的具体活跃学习技术比教职员工的经验和培训在有效实施积极学习方法中的经验和培训。所有部分的学生显示了课程主题的长期保留,并在内容递送方法中具有相似的偏好。性别差异突触,女学生对他们的男性同行有很大的影响。本研究的结果为其他研究人员提供了希望在介绍工程课程中实施积极学习方法的洞察力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号