首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Team-Based Learning and Screencasts in the Undergraduate Thermal-Fluid Sciences Curriculum
【24h】

Team-Based Learning and Screencasts in the Undergraduate Thermal-Fluid Sciences Curriculum

机译:本科热流体科学课程中的基于团队的学习和截图

获取原文

摘要

In order to actively engage students in their own learning while maximizing the breadth and depth of course content, the author utilized a Team-Based Learning approach supplemented by screencasts to redesign the two semester thermal-fluid-sciences course sequence in the author's department. In response to the revised course format, student participation and student discussion of the course material increased significantly. Students' enthusiasm and curiosity are evident in the classroom, which were not observed in previous offerings of the same course sequence. Students have taken increased ownership of the learning process, come prepared for class, and are able to apply higher-level analysis skills to complex team-application problems. Since becoming a faculty member, it has been my goal to actively engage students in the classroom in order to enhance student participation and ultimately student learning. At the same time the breadth and depth of material cannot be sacrificed. While Thermodynamics, Fluid Dynamics, and Heat Transfer are traditionally taught in 3 or 4 distinct courses as part of most Mechanical Engineering programs, Union University offers a two semester Fluid-Thermal Science course as part of a General Engineering degree with Mechanical Engineering concentration. Teaching this course sequence - one course during the sophomore year (EGR 250) and one during the senior year (EGR 450) - I have found that the three core subjects - thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and heat transfer - lend themselves well to being taught in an integrated fashion. However, while the integrated approach seems slightly more efficient than teaching the courses separately, it is not feasible to cover all of the material from the 3 or 4 separate courses. In addition, while great textbooks have been written for integrated Fluid-Thermal Science courses, providing good macroscopic overviews and breadth, they tend to lack the level of depth desired to develop critical higher-level analysis skills.
机译:为了积极参与自己的学习,同时最大化广度和深度的课程内容,提交人利用了一种基于团队的学习方法,该方法补充了截图,重新设计了作者部门的两个学期热流体科学课程序列。回应修订后的课程格式,学生参与和学生讨论课程材料显着增加。在课堂上,学生的热情和好奇心是明显的,在同一课程序列的先前没有观察到。学生们提高了对学习过程的所有权,为课堂准备,并能够将更高级别的分析技能应用于复杂的团队应用问题。自成为一名教师以来,我的目标是积极参与课堂的学生,以提高学生参与和最终学习。同时不能牺牲宽度和厚度。虽然热力学,流体动力学和传热传统,但传统上以3或4个不同的课程教授,作为大多数机械工程计划的一部分,联合大学提供了两个学期的流体 - 热学科学课程,作为机械工程集中的一般工程学位的一部分。教授本课程序列 - 在大二年期间(EGR 250)和高年级(EGR 450)中的一门课程 - 我发现三个核心科目 - 热力学,流体动力学和传热 - 为被教导而引起自己以综合的方式。然而,虽然综合方法似乎略高于单独教导课程略高,但涵盖3或4个单独课程的所有材料是不可行的。此外,虽然为综合流体 - 热科学课程编写了伟大的教科书,但提供了良好的宏观概述和广度,但它们倾向于缺乏所需的深度水平,以发展批判性更高级别的分析技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号