首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Improving Student Success and Retention Rates in Engineering: A Four-Year Longitudinal Assessment of the DYP Program
【24h】

Improving Student Success and Retention Rates in Engineering: A Four-Year Longitudinal Assessment of the DYP Program

机译:提高学生的成功和在工程中的保留率:DYP计划的四年纵向评估

获取原文

摘要

This evidence-based practice paper presents a four year longitudinal study following the first cohort of first-year engineering students that was exposed to the "Design Your Process to become a "World Class" Engineering Student" (DYP) program at a four year institution. Many students enter the engineering disciplines vastly unprepared to be successful in the rigors of engineering academia. Student retention numbers in engineering are low and some researchers attribute this low retention rate to a lack of academic skills needed to be academically successful. Typically, approaches to increase the nature and quality of engineering undergraduate education experience are focused on instructional and/or curricular changes. A recently developed innovative approach, called the DYP program, is different in that it focuses on what the students can do themselves to become self-regulated students and therefore are not only more likely to graduate with an engineering degree but also with a higher quality, e. g. with a higher GPA. The DYP program synthesizes what has been shown in the research literature to be effective and what should be done in first-year engineering seminars into a comprehensive, scalable and easy-to-implement approach. The main components of the approach are: 1. Coverage of student development topics in a first-year engineering course/lab/seminar to facilitate new students' growth, instilling positive change, and developing strategies that will enhance student success. 2. Building upon the student development topics introduced in the course/lab/seminar, students are asked to design their own individual process to be successful in graduating with an engineering degree and write a reflective comprehensive report at the end of the course. Previously published results reported a positive impact on first-year engineering student retention and performance after the first year of implementation of the DYP program. The results of the four-year longitudinal study confirm an increase in overall GPA and persistence for the first-year, but more remarkably it shows that the DYP program has a long term sustainable effect on student success. Results show statistically significant differences in GPA and persistence rates between the DYP cohort and control cohort for all years. The DYP cohort showed higher overall GPAs: +0.53 year one, +0.33 year two, +0.31 year three and +0.26 year four (p<0.001, except for year four where p<0.005, N=156 for DYP cohort at year one, N=193 for control cohort at year one). Comparing persistence rates between the cohorts also show a positive impact for the DYP student cohort. Students exposed to the DYP program showed higher persistence rates by 11% and 10% for the first and second year and by 16% for the third year compared to the control cohort. All increases in persistence are significant (p<0.05). Comparing how many students graduated with a Bachelor's degree in any engineering major after four years at the institution reveals that the cohort exposed to the DYP program had 24 students graduated after four years compared to 10 in the comparison cohort.
机译:基于证据的练习案件在一个四年的一年工程学生队列之后介绍了一项四年的纵向研究,这是一个四年制度的“设计您的过程”世界级“工程学生”(DYP)计划的“设计您的过程” 。许多学生在工程学术界的严格中,进入工程学科,毫无疑问地取得了成功。工程中的学生保留数量低,一些研究人员将这种低保留率归因于缺乏学术成功所需的学术技能。通常,提高工程本科教育经验的性质和质量的方法专注于教学和/或课程变化。最近开发的创新方法称为DYP计划,不同的是,它的侧重于学生可以成为自我监管的学生,因此不仅更有可能毕业,而且具有更高的品质, e。 G。具有更高的GPA。 DYP计划综合了研究文献中所示有效的东西,以及在一年的工程研讨会中应以全面,可扩展且易于实现的方法进行。该方法的主要组成部分是:1。在一年的工程课程/实验室/研讨会中覆盖学生开发主题,以促进新的学生的增长,灌输积极变革和发展策略,并提高学生成功的战略。 2.在课程/实验室/研讨会上介绍的学生发展主题,学生被要求设计自己的个人流程,以便在毕业于工程学位,并在课程结束时撰写反思综合报告。以前公布的结果报告了在执行“DYP”计划的第一年后对一年工程学生保留和表现的积极影响。为期四年纵向研究的结果证实了第一年的总体GPA和持久性的增加,但更值得注意地表明,DYP计划对学生成功具有长期可持续影响。结果显示全部统计上GPA和持久性差异差异。 DYP队列显示出更高的整体GPA:+0.53年,+0.33年,+0.31年三和+0.26年四(P <0.001,除了第一个,Dyp Cohort的P <0.005,N = 156年除外) ,n = 193年为一年的控制队列)。比较群组之间的持久性率也为DYP学生队列的积极影响。与对照队列相比,第一个和第二年暴露于DYP计划的学生表现出更高的持续率,持续11%和10%,而第三年持续16%。持续存在的所有增加都很显着(P <0.05)。比较在机构四年后,有多少学生毕业的任何工程专业学士学位揭示了暴露于DYP计划的队列,在四年后毕业的24名学生在比较队列中的10年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号