This paper examines a number of alternatives for improving the Computer Science accreditation process. The specific focus of the paper is on the accreditation process sponsored by ABET - the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. The paper considers alternatives for ABET accreditation on a four-level spectrum. The most radical alternative is a Computer Science degree program with no ABET accreditation at all. On the opposite end of the spectrum is the ABET status quo, with a fully accredited degree program. At each alternative level of the spectrum, the paper discusses the pros and cons relevant to that level. Where appropriate, the paper makes concrete experience-based suggestions for how specific aspects of the accreditation process could be improved.
展开▼
