首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >When Less is More: Integrating Technical Writing Instruction in a Large, First-Year Engineering Course
【24h】

When Less is More: Integrating Technical Writing Instruction in a Large, First-Year Engineering Course

机译:较少的时间:在大型第一年工程课程中整合技术写作教学

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Providing technical writing instruction within a large, first-year engineering course involves both logistical and imaginative challenges but can also yield substantive results. In the fall of 2003, the University of Maine initiated a new plan, called the Engineering Communication Project (ECP), to integrate technical writing instruction throughout the College of Engineering curricula. Civil Engineering Materials Laboratory (CIE 111) was the first course to incorporate the new plan. CIE 111 is a 1-credit laboratory component of a basic course in civil engineering materials, incorporating topics in material variability, plastics, metals, wood and concrete. Historically, students produced five full academic lab reports during the semester, with less than satisfactory results for the most part. Recent enrollment growth (to around 100 students) introduced further complication. The new ECP approach replaced the academic lab reports with five case-based memo assignments, which allowed for more specific instructional goals, more meaningful feedback to students and a reduced paper-reading load for engineering faculty. Specific goals for the memo assignments included learning memo format, and developing COPE writing skills (Clarity, Organization, Precision and Economy). The ECP is a cooperative effort between the Department of English and the College of Engineering and is supported by a grant from the Davis Educational Foundation. In summary, each engineering department will use alumni and faculty surveys to develop core competencies in technical communication. Departments will then integrate those competencies in appropriate courses throughout the curricula, with guidance from English department faculty. William Manion and David Adams describe the design and implementation of this assignment regimen and use examples for illustration. Manion and Adams also discuss some of the issues encountered and present initial assessments of the effort.
机译:在大型一年的工程课程中提供技术写作指导涉及物流和富有想象力的挑战,但也可以产生实质性成果。 2003年秋季,缅因大学启动了一个堪称工程通信项目(ECP)的新计划,以整合整个工程课程学院的技术写作教学。土木工程材料实验室(CIE 111)是纳入新计划的第一课程。 CIE 111是土木工程材料基础课程的1学分实验室组成部分,包括材料变异性,塑料,金属,木材和混凝土的主题。从历史上看,学生在学期期间制作了五个完整的学术实验室报告,大部分时间都不令人满意。最近的注册增长(到大约100名学生)引入了进一步的并发症。新的ECP方法取代了具有五个基于案例的备忘录分配的学术实验室报告,这允许更具体的教学目标,对学生的更具意义的反馈以及工程学院的减少的纸张阅读负荷。备忘录分配的具体目标包括学习备忘录格式,以及制定应对写作技巧(清晰,组织,精密和经济)。 ECP是英语和工程学院之间的合作努力,并得到了戴维斯教育基金会的补助金。总之,每个工程署都将使用校友和教师调查,以制定技术沟通中的核心竞争力。然后,部门将在整个课程中的适当课程中纳入这些能力,从英语部门教职员工中有指导。 William Manion和David Adams描述了这个分配方案的设计和实施,并使用示例进行插图。酋长和亚当斯还讨论了一些遇到的问题,并提出了对努力的初步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号