首页> 外文会议>International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design >COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUAL AND TACTILE SIGNAL DETECTION TASKS APPLIED TO THE SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
【24h】

COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUAL AND TACTILE SIGNAL DETECTION TASKS APPLIED TO THE SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS

机译:应用于车载信息系统安全评估的视觉和触觉信号检测任务的比较

获取原文

摘要

The Peripheral Detection Task (PDT) is a widely applied method for safety assessment of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS). In this study, the PDT was compared to a Tactile Detection Task (TDT) where the visual stimulus used for the PDT was replaced by tactile vibrators, placed on the wrists. The sensitivity of the two methods to different cognitive and visual secondary tasks was investigated in different real-world driving conditions. The results showed that both methods were sensitive to visual and cognitive secondary task load in a range of different driving environments. The sensitivity was generally stronger for the TDT than the PDT. It was concluded that the TDT could be a viable alternative to the PDT for IVIS assessment.
机译:外围检测任务(PDT)是一种广泛应用的车载信息系统安全评估方法(IVIS)。在该研究中,将PDT与触觉检测任务(TDT)进行比较,其中用于PDT的视觉刺激被触觉振动器取代,放置在手腕上。在不同的现实世界驾驶条件下研究了两种方法对不同认知和视觉二次任务的敏感性。结果表明,两种方法对一系列不同的驾驶环境中的视觉和认知二次任务负载敏感。对于TDT而言,敏感度通常比PDT更强。得出结论是,TDT可能是对IVIS评估的PDT可行的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号