首页> 外文会议>ASME Turbo Expo >COMPARISON BETWEEN UNSTRUCTURED AND STRUCTURED MESHES WITH DIFFERENT TURBULENCE MODELS FOR A HIGH PRESSURE TURBINE APPLICATION
【24h】

COMPARISON BETWEEN UNSTRUCTURED AND STRUCTURED MESHES WITH DIFFERENT TURBULENCE MODELS FOR A HIGH PRESSURE TURBINE APPLICATION

机译:具有不同湍流模型的非结构化与结构网格与高压涡轮机应用的比较

获取原文

摘要

For the CFD community the mesh generation is still one of the most important stages to obtain a good flow solution based on the full Navier-Stokes equations. For turbomachinery blade passages this task is not straightforward mainly due to the 3D domain and the complex geometries involved. The mesh quality and elements distribution, orthogonality, smoothing, aspect ratio and angles are very important to guarantee a good numerical stability and solution accuracy. Moreover, the structure of the mesh inside the boundary-layer should be built carefully mainly in the regions where there are horseshoe vortices and tip leakage flow. In this work, the 3D turbulent flow is calculated and compared for structured and unstructured meshes including two equation models and Reynolds stress models. A high pressure turbine with 4.0 total-to-total pressure ratio is used in this study. A commercial software is used for mesh generation and flow calculation. The results are presented comparing the pressure ratio and efficiency from numerical solutions and experimental data and flow properties distributions along the blade span.
机译:对于CFD社区,网格生成仍然是基于Full Navier-Stokes方程获得良好流量解决方案的最重要阶段之一。对于涡轮机械刀片段落,此任务并不直接,主要是由于3D域和所涉及的复杂几何形状。网格质量和元素分布,正交,平滑,纵横比和角度非常重要,可以保证良好的数值稳定性和解决方案准确性。此外,边界层内部的网格结构应主要在有马蹄形涡流和尖端泄漏流的区域中仔细构建。在这项工作中,计算并比较3D湍流,并将包括两个方程模型和雷诺应力模型的结构化和非结构化网格进行比较。本研究使用具有4.0总量至总压力比的高压涡轮机。商业软件用于网格生成和流量计算。提出了比较来自数值溶液和实验数据和沿叶片跨度的实验数据和流动性分布的压力比和效率的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号