首页> 外文会议>Laser Florence (Conference) >Effects of LLLT on the periarthritis of the shoulder: a clinical study on different treatments with corticosteroid injections or a wait-and-see policy
【24h】

Effects of LLLT on the periarthritis of the shoulder: a clinical study on different treatments with corticosteroid injections or a wait-and-see policy

机译:Lllt对肩部膜炎的影响:皮质类固醇注射或等待和看法不同治疗的临床研究

获取原文

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three types of treatments in the periarthritis of the shoulder: corticosteroid injections, Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) or wait-and-see-policy. BACKGROUND DATA: Low level laser irradiation is a treatment method widely used in medical science. Many disorders, such as osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal conditions with pain, have been treated with LLLT. METHODS: Patients, suffering from periarthritis of the shoulder of at least 6 weeks' duration, were recruited by family doctors. We randomly allocated eligible patients to 6 weeks of treatment n. 20 (33%) with corticosteroid injection, n. 21 (35%) with LLLT and with wait-and-see policy n.19 (31%). We applied a number of 12 sessions with infrared Diode Laser Ga-As (904 nm), 60 W maximum power, peak power per pulse 27 W, pulse frequency 1280 Hz, average point region 2-8 J; dose/point = 3-4 J; total energy density 24 J/cm2. Outcome measures included general improvement, severity of the main complaint, pain, shoulder disability, and patient satisfaction. Severity of shoulder complaints, abduction and elevation of the arm, and the pressure pain threshold were assessed. The principal analysis was done on an intention treatment basis. We assessed all outcomes at 3,6, 12, 26, 52 weeks. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 60 patients. At 6 weeks, corticosteroid injections were significantly better than all other therapy options for all outcome measures. Success rates were 90% (18) compared with 52% (11) for LLLT and 35% (7) for wait-and-see policy. Long-term differences between injections and LLLT were significantly in favour of LLLT. Success rate at 52 weeks were 14 (70%) for injections, 19 (90.5%) for LLLT, and 16 (84%) for wait-and-see policy. LLLT had better results than a wait-and-see policy, but differences were not significant ( p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be properly informed about the advantages and disadvantages of the treatment options for the periarthritis of the shoulder. The decision to treat with LLLT or to adopt a wait-and-see policy might depend on available resources, since the relative gain of LLLT is better, but also small at long-term.
机译:本研究的目的是比较三种类型治疗在肩膀的血管炎中的疗效:皮质类固醇注射,低水平激光治疗(LLLT)或等待和咨询政策。背景数据:低水平激光照射是医学科学广泛应用的治疗方法。已经用LLLT治疗了许多疾病,例如骨关节炎和肌肉骨骼条件。方法:患者,患有至少6周龄的肩周炎的患者,由家庭医生招募。我们随机分配给符合条件的患者到6周的治疗N. 20(33%)皮质类固醇注射,n。 21(35%)与LLLT,等待和见政策第n.19(31%)。我们用红外二极管激光GA-AS(904nm),60W的最大功率,每个脉冲27W,脉冲频率1280Hz,平均点2-8 j;剂量/点= 3-4 j;总能量密度24 J / cm2。结果措施包括一般性改善,主要投诉的严重程度,疼痛,肩部残疾和患者满意度。评估肩部投诉,绑架和抬高的严重程度以及压力疼痛阈值。主要分析是在意图治疗的基础上进行的。我们评估了3,6,12,26,52周的所有结果。结果:我们随机分配了60名患者。在6周后,皮质类固醇注射率明显优于所有其他结果措施的所有其他治疗方案。成功率为90%(18),而LLLT的52%(11)为52%(11),适用于等待和见政策35%(7)。注射和LLLT之间的长期差异显着得到了LLLT。 52周的成功率为14(70%)注射,19(90.5%)为LLLT,候补政策的16(84%)。 LLLT比等待和看法的策略更好,但差异不显着(P <0.0001)。结论:应当正确了解患者对肩部围菌炎的治疗方案的优缺点。根据LLLT或采用等待和查看政策对待治疗的决定可能取决于可用资源,因为LLLT的相对增益更好,但长期也很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号