...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparative Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Injection, Corticosteroid Injection and Ultrasonic Therapy in the Treatment of Periarthritis Shoulder RC15-RC18
【24h】

Comparative Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Injection, Corticosteroid Injection and Ultrasonic Therapy in the Treatment of Periarthritis Shoulder RC15-RC18

机译:富血小板血浆注射,皮质类固醇注射和超声疗法治疗肩周炎RC15-RC18的比较疗效

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Periarthritis (PA) shoulder characterised by pain and restricted range of motion has a plethora of treatment options with inconclusive evidence. Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is an emerging treatment option and its efficacy needs to be examined and compared with other routine interventions.Aim: To assess the efficacy of PRP injection and compare it with corticosteroid injection and ultrasonic therapy in the treatment of PA shoulder.Materials and Methods: Patients with PA shoulder (n=195) were randomised to receive single injection of PRP (2 ml) or corticosteroid (80 mg of methylprednisolone) or ultrasonic therapy (seven sittings in two weeks; 1.5 W/cm2, 1 MHz, continuous mode). All participants were also advised to perform a home based 10 minute exercise therapy. The primary outcome measure was active range of motion of the shoulder. Secondary outcome measures used were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and a shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) for function. Participants were evaluated at 0, 3, 6 and 12 weeks. Chi-square test, one way and repeated measures of ANOVA tests were used to determine significant differences.Results: PRP treatment resulted in statistically significant improvements over corticosteroid and ultrasonic therapy in active as well as passive range of motion of shoulder, VAS and QuickDASH at 12 weeks. At six weeks, PRP treatment resulted in statistically significant improvements over ultrasonic therapy in VAS and QuickDASH. No major adverse effects were observed.Conclusion: This study demonstrates that single injection of PRP is effective and better than corticosteroid injection or ultrasonic therapy in treatment of PA shoulder.
机译:简介:以疼痛和活动范围受限为特征的肩周炎(PA)肩部有过多的治疗选择,没有确凿的证据。富血小板血浆(PRP)是新兴的治疗选择,其有效性需要与其他常规干预措施进行比较并进行比较。目的:评估PRP注射的疗效并将其与皮质类固醇注射和超声疗法在PA肩部治疗中进行比较。材料和方法:将PA肩部患者(n = 195)随机接受单次注射PRP(2 ml)或皮质类固醇(80 mg甲基泼尼松龙)或超声治疗(两周内坐7次; 1.5 W / cm2,1 MHz ,连续模式)。还建议所有参与者进行家庭式10分钟运动疗法。主要结局指标是肩膀活动范围。使用的次要结局指标是用于疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)和用于功能的简化版的《臂,肩和手残疾》(QuickDASH)。在0、3、6和12周对参与者进行评估。卡方检验,单因素方差分析的一种方法和重复测量被用来确定显着差异。结果:PRP治疗在主动和被动运动范围内,肩关节,VAS和QuickDASH的主动和被动运动范围上均较皮质类固醇和超声治疗具有统计学上的显着改善。 12周六周时,在VAS和QuickDASH中,PRP治疗比超声治疗具有统计学上的显着改善。结论:本研究表明单次注射PRP在治疗PA肩部方面有效且优于皮质类固醇注射或超声治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号