首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition >A PROCEDURE FOR GATHERING EXPERIENCE FROM PRACTICING ENGINEERS IN ORDER TO TEACH EXPERIENCE IN THE CLASSROOM
【24h】

A PROCEDURE FOR GATHERING EXPERIENCE FROM PRACTICING ENGINEERS IN ORDER TO TEACH EXPERIENCE IN THE CLASSROOM

机译:用于从练习工程师提供经验的程序,以便在教室里教授经验

获取原文

摘要

Helping students transition from novice to expert requires imparting some level of experience. In order to teach experience in the undergraduate classroom, the instructor must have a record of that experience. For the purposes of this discussion, "experience" and "knowledge" have the same meaning. In some cases, that experience has been recorded in books and journals. Books and journals, however, often focus on low- to mid-level cognitive skills: knowledge, comprehension, application, and analysis. Thus, the experience that forms the basis of high-level cognitive skills, synthesis and evaluation, often exists only in the memories of practicing engineers. Therefore, in order to teach how practicing engineers have transitioned from novice to expert, instructors might need to gather experience directly from the practitioners. It is important to note that much of the cognitive psychology literature focuses on obtaining information on how experts choose which experience or knowledge to use to make a decision (decision making). That is different from the techniques used to obtain the experiences as data (knowledge). Techniques for obtaining experiences include case study, critical incident, and question-and-answer. Each technique has advantages and limitations which are discussed. The authors have used all three techniques in interviews with practicing structural engineers to elicit the tools used to evaluate the reasonableness of analysis and design results. Of the techniques, critical incident proved to be the most effective for eliciting this type of information. Interviews with 35 practicing structural engineers resulted in 67 specific incidents of errors discovered. Using the question-and-answer technique with the 35 engineers resulted in just 20 tools for evaluating results. This paper presents a detailed description of how the critical incident technique was implemented along with guidelines for adapting the technique for use by other researchers.
机译:帮助学生从新手到专家的转型需要传递一些经验。为了教授本科教室的经验,教师必须有一个经验的记录。出于本讨论的目的,“体验”和“知识”具有相同的含义。在某些情况下,该经验已被记录在书籍和期刊中。然而,书籍和期刊通常专注于低至中级认知技能:知识,理解,应用和分析。因此,形成高级认知技能,合成和评估基础的经验通常仅存在于练习工程师的记忆中。因此,为了教导练习工程师如何从新手转向专家,教师可能需要直接从从业者收集经验。值得注意的是,大部分认知心理学文献侧重于获取专家如何选择哪些经验或知识来做出决定(决策制作)的信息。这与用于获得数据(知识)的经验的技术不同。获得经验的技术包括案例研究,批判性事件和问答。每种技术都具有讨论的优点和限制。作者利用了所有三种在采访中使用三种技术,练习结构工程师引出用于评估分析和设计结果合理性的工具。在技​​术中,危急事件被证明是最有效地引发这种类型的信息。采访35架实践结构工程师导致发现了67个特定的错误事件。使用带有35名工程师的问答技术导致了20个评估结果的工具。本文介绍了临界事故技术如何实施的详细说明以及适应其他研究人员使用技术的指导方针。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号