首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition >APPLYING K-8 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CURRICULA TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM THE EDUCATOR RESOURCE CENTER AT THE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE, BOSTON
【24h】

APPLYING K-8 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CURRICULA TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM THE EDUCATOR RESOURCE CENTER AT THE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE, BOSTON

机译:将K-8科技课程应用于工程教育:从Boston博物馆的教育工作者资源中心可以学中学到什么

获取原文

摘要

The National Research Council and the International Technology Education Association have established standards for technological literacy, and several states require engineering concepts to be taught and assessed on state tests. Each year sees the publication of more curricular materials to address these standards, but many teachers and districts lack the resources or time to determine which curriculum is most appropriate for the learning needs of their students. The primary goal of this study is to consider the usefulness of traditional science and technology curricular materials for K-8 educators who are interested in addressing engineering content standards. This paper describes an analysis of selected K-8 science and technology curricula in the context of teaching engineering. The set of curricula considered here is a convenience sample: an online database of K-8 science and technology textbooks and teacher's guides that have been reviewed by the Educator Resource Center at the Museum of Science, Boston, according to their appropriateness for teaching about engineering. Each curriculum was previously evaluated according to 20 criteria by the Educator Resource Center (ERC). These 20 evaluation parameters measure six key characteristics: coverage of national and state standards, usability by K-8 teachers, adequacy of background information and educator support, availability of different amounts of scaffolding for student activities, variety of instructional approaches to the design process, and provision of assessment tools. In this meta-analysis, evaluations of 44 different curricular modules are compiled, and summary statistics of the entire sample set and specific subsets are computed and compared. The paper concludes with recommendations for the application of ERC-reviewed science and technology curricula to K-8 engineering education. It also identifies the national and state engineering/technology standards that are currently not addressed by the ERC science and technology textbooks and teacher's guides.
机译:国家研究委员会和国际技术教育协会建立了技术识字标准,有几个国家要求在国家测试中教授和评估工程概念。每年都会看到更多课程材料来解决这些标准,但许多教师和地区缺乏确定哪些课程最适合学生学习需求的资源或时间。本研究的主要目标是考虑对兴趣解决工程内容标准的K-8教育工作者的传统科技课程材料的有用性。本文介绍了在教学工程背景下选择的K-8科技课程分析。这里考虑的课程是一款方便样品:根据他们的科学博物馆的教育家资源中心审查了K-8科学和技术教科书和教师指南的一套方便样品,并根据他们的工程教学的拟批准。之前,每个课程都是根据教育者资源中心(ERC)的20个标准评估的。这20个评估参数测量六个关键特征:覆盖国家和州标准,由K-8教师的可用性,背景信息和教育者的充分性,不同数量的学生活动脚手架,各种教学方法对设计过程,并提供评估工具。在该元分析中,编译了44个不同课程模块的评估,并计算了整个样本集和特定子集的汇总统计数据。本文缔结了建议,即将再审查科技课程适用于K-8工程教育。它还确定了ERC科学和技术教科书和教师指南目前未解决的国家和国家工程/技术标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号