首页> 外文会议>ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition >COMPARING CONTACT STRESS ESTIMATES OF SOME STRAIGHT BEVEL GEARS WITH ISO 10300 STANDARDS
【24h】

COMPARING CONTACT STRESS ESTIMATES OF SOME STRAIGHT BEVEL GEARS WITH ISO 10300 STANDARDS

机译:使用ISO 10300标准比较一些直斜齿轮的接触应力估计

获取原文

摘要

The pitting resistance of straight bevel gears, like other gears, is commonly assessed on the basis of the contact stress in a gear mesh. A new contact stress model for straight bevel gears is used to estimate the contact stress in some gearset designs and compared with predictions from ISO 10300 bevel gear standards. In the cases considered, the new model contact stresses defer from the ISO values in the range of 13% to 33%, with the ISO predictions generally on the higher side. These deviations appear to be somewhat high but not unreasonable because of obvious differences in the two models. The ISO standard uses the mid facewidth cone radius in its contact stress model while the new model uses the cone backend radius which is larger than the mid facewidth cone radius. Another contributing factor is that the load service factor values evaluated from ISO methods are generally higher than those of the new model values, based largely on American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) methods. It should be noted that the power ratings for all the design cases studied are below 10 kW.
机译:直锥齿轮(如其他齿轮)的凹坑电阻通常在齿轮网中的接触应力的基础上进行评估。用于直锥齿轮的新接触应力模型用于估计一些齿轮集设计中的接触应力,并与ISO 10300斜面标准的预测相比。在考虑的情况下,新的模型接触应力从ISO值推迟为13%至33%,ISO预测通常在较高侧。由于两种模型中的明显差异,这些偏差似乎有点高但不合理。 ISO标准在其接触应力模型中使用了中面锥半径,而新模型使用锥形后半径大于中面锥半径。另一个贡献因素是由ISO方法评估的负载服务因子值通常高于新型值,这主要基于美国齿轮制造商协会(AGMA)方法。应该注意的是,研究的所有设计案例的电力额定值低于10 kW。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号