首页> 外文会议>Conference on chemical, biochemical, and environmental fiber sensors >Comparative analysis of toxin detection in biological and enviromental samples
【24h】

Comparative analysis of toxin detection in biological and enviromental samples

机译:生物环境样本中毒素检测的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

The basic recognition schemes underlying the principles of standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) protocols are increasingly being adapted for use with new detection devices. A direct comparison was made using a fiber optic biosensor that employs evanescent wave detection and an ELISA using avidin-biotin. The assays were developed for the detection of Ricinus communis agglutinin II, also known as ricin or RCA$-60$/. Detection limits between the two methods were comparable for ricin in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), however results in complex samples differed slightly. In PBS, sensitivity for ricin was 1 ng/ml using the fiber optic device and 500 pg/ml using the ELISA. The fiber optic sensor could not detect ricin directly in urine or serum spiked with 5 ng/ml ricin, however, the ELISA showed detection but at reduced levels to the PBS control.
机译:标准酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和放射免疫测定(RIA)方案的基本识别方案越来越多地适用于新的检测装置。使用使用荧光素 - 生物素使用渐逝波检测和ELISA的光纤生物传感器进行直接比较。该测定是用于检测Ricinus Communis alglutinin II,也称为Ricin或RCA $ -60 $ /。两种方法之间的检测限值对于磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中的蓖麻素相当,然而,复杂样品的结果略有不同。在PBS中,使用ELISA使用光纤器件和500pg / mL的蓖麻素为1ng / ml。光纤传感器不能直接检测尿素或血清掺入5ng / ml蓖麻植物的血清,然而,ELISA显示出检测,但在降低水平降低到PBS控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号