【24h】

iTunes~?: User Evaluation

机译:iTunes〜?:用户评估

获取原文

摘要

This research was motivated by a previous study which indicates the ascension of the Apple?'s sales and the downfall of 14% of iTunes services. Therefore, the study intends to whether if iTunes have usability and user experience problems that prevent users from having the best possible experience, and if users prefer others softwares or devices for synchronizing tasks, like transferring songs from one device to another. The evaluation and interaction method selected for the tests conduced in this study were based on the framework of DECIDE by Preece, Sharp and Rogers [23], and concepts of usability engineering lifecycle established by Mayhew [24] and Ahram [22], in which a users observation technique applied with at least ten non-iTunes consumers. The results indicate some critical user experience scenario and points to several key problems to be addressed, especially after most of the testers couldn't solve the tasks provided. Therefore, some suggestions which were related to iTunes can be summarized for improving the menu and feedback options, as well as the function of transferring archives from computer to mobile and vice-versa, which should be more clear and easier to address, while letting the user know possible alternatives avaialable.
机译:这项研究受到前一项研究的动机,这表明苹果的提升?销售额和14%的iTunes服务的垮台。因此,该研究旨在是否具有可用性和用户体验的问题,防止用户具有最佳体验,以及用户更喜欢用于同步任务的软件或设备,例如将从一个设备传输到另一个设备的歌曲。在本研究中的测试中选择的评估和相互作用方法基于Precee,Sharp和Rogers [23]的决定框架,以及Mayhew [24]和Ahram [22]建立的可用性工程生命周期的概念,其中用户观察技术至少有十个非iTunes消费者应用。结果表明了一些关键的用户体验场景并指向要解决的几个关键问题,特别是在大多数测试人员无法解决所提供的任务之后。因此,可以概述与iTunes相关的一些建议,以改进菜单和反馈选项,以及将档案从计算机转移到移动的功能,反之亦然,这应该更清晰,更容易解决,同时让用户知道可能的替代方案是avaialable。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号