首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(631) MEDICAL STUDENTS' PERCEPTION OF THE DEPLOYMENT OF INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS FOR PROBLEM BASED LEARNING
【24h】

(631) MEDICAL STUDENTS' PERCEPTION OF THE DEPLOYMENT OF INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS FOR PROBLEM BASED LEARNING

机译:(631)医学院对基于问题的学习的交互式白板部署的看法

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Interactive whiteboards (IWB) were introduced in all the classrooms used for problembased learning (PBL) sessions within the University of Geneva faculty of medicine at the beginning of2014. Students were surveyed at the end of the following semester to evaluate their perception anduse of IWBs, and measure IWBs' impact on PBL process, students' motivation, and group functioning.Method: Bachelor students of Years 2 and 3 answered a 61-item self-administered online surveyexploring eight themes: IWB launching, IWB use, practice of the writing and drawing software, role ofthe secretary, PBL process, personal interaction with IWB, group functioning, and socio-demographicdata.Results: 236 students (71.7%) completed the survey. Globally students found IWBs as well as the texteditor easy to use (mean 4.8± 0.9 standard deviation; easier for men, p=.007; and 4.9±0.9 on a 1 to 6Likert scale). Other functionalities were occasionally or rarely used, as well as the integration oflearning materials (articles, book chapter, and websites) in the notebook. When compared to thesituation before the deployment of IWBs, students did not report higher motivation (3.2±1.4), moreconcentration (3.2±1.4), more creativity (3.7±1.6), better understanding (3.2±1.3), or bettermemorization of what was displayed in the board (3.3±1.4). They agreed that the use of multimedialearning resources was facilitated (4.9±1.1), the material produced by the group was richer indrawings, images, Abstracts (4.3±1.4), but did not think the group was better organised (3.6±1.4) northat the elements discussed were more precise (3.6±1.4). After the first phase of a PBL session, theelectronic notes were used by the majority of the students to complete their own documentation. Theywere however not used more frequently than before (3.2±1.7), and only used sometimes as a startingpoint for the reporting phase of the PBL session (2.1±0.8).Conclusions: The implementation of IWBs within the institution was rather positively welcomed bystudents. Whereas they deemed the material produced by the group was enriched when compared tothe situation without IWBs, there was no evidence, neither at the individual, nor at the groups' level, ofa significant change regarding the learning process and organisation.
机译:背景:在2014年初,在日内瓦大学医学院内的所有教室中介绍了交互式白板(IWB)。学生在下一学期结束时进行了调查,以评估他们对IWBS的看法,并衡量IWBS对PBL进程的影响,学生的动机和团体功能。方法:年2年级的学士学位和3个答案-administered在线surveyexploring八大主题:IWB启动,IWB使用,写作实践和绘图软件,角色书记国税发,PBL过程中,与IWB个人互动,集团运作,以及社会demographicdata.Results:236名学生(71.7%)完成该调查。全球学生发现IWBS以及易于使用的文本指南(平均4.8±0.9标准差;男性更容易,P = .007;和1至6升3.9±0.9)。其他功能偶尔或很少使用,以及笔记本电脑中的入学材料(文章,书籍章节和网站)的整合。与在部署IWBS之前相比,学生没有报告更高的动机(3.2±1.4),德伦康康复(3.2±1.4),更多的创造力(3.7±1.6),更好地理解(3.2±1.3),或更好地识别显示在电路板(3.3±1.4)。他们一致认为,利用multimedialearning资源提供了便利(4.9±1.1),由集团生产的材料是丰富indrawings,图片,文摘(4.3±1.4),但没想到,该集团组织得更好(3.6±1.4)northat所讨论的元素更精确(3.6±1.4)。在PBL会话的第一阶段之后,大多数学生使用电子笔记来完成自己的文档。然而,他们没有比以前更频繁地使用(3.2±1.7),并且仅用作为PBL会话报告阶段的出轨(2.1±0.8).Conclusions:在该机构内的IWBS实施相当积极欢迎。而他们认为该集团生产的材料相比没有IWBs tothe形势充实,没有证据,没有在个人,也不是在群体水平,OFA关于学习过程和组织显著变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号