首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(654) TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF PERCEIVED QUALITY RESULTS OF ONLINE TEACHING OF THE MASTER'S DEGREE IN OCCUPATIONAL RISK PREVENTION OF MIGUEL HERNANDEZ UNIVERSITY
【24h】

(654) TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF PERCEIVED QUALITY RESULTS OF ONLINE TEACHING OF THE MASTER'S DEGREE IN OCCUPATIONAL RISK PREVENTION OF MIGUEL HERNANDEZ UNIVERSITY

机译:(654)米格尔湖南大学职业风险预防硕士学位硕士学位的临时素质产量

获取原文

摘要

The introduction of online or distance learning in the University is a necessity in studies of Masterwhere virtual learning appears as a solution to the problems that traditional education cannot resolve:geographical problems, lack of time, demand, offering more opportunities for training. However,despite the boom in e-learning, it should not fall into the false idea that is the solution to all problems oftraditional teaching. In fact it also has its disadvantages as it may be little interaction between teachersand students; feedback can be very slow; is more difficult to rectify errors in materials, evaluations,there are even more dropouts than classroom teaching.The focus on eLearning should be strategic, so that the implementation of a distance learning platformshould allow the implementation of tools that are hardly applicable in the traditional class and withwhich one can get a more effective learning. With this frame of reference we offer the experience inwhich we are involved in university teaching Masters in Occupational Risk Prevention at the UniversityMiguel Hernandez taught in online mode using the Moodle platform that allows the use of differentteaching resources (exercises, forums, questionnaires) to encourage the learning of different subjects.Annually Miguel Hernandez University quality plans service, makes a survey of perceived quality formaster's students. The aim of this study is to observe how it has changed the quality perceived bystudents through these surveys. Results of surveys for each of the subjects taught in the Masterduring different courses since its introduction in the academic year 2010/2011 were studied. Duringthe first years the standard model of student survey on the Quality of Teaching in the Masters of 7questions was used, while in the most recent academic years the better survey model suited toBlended Teaching in the Masters consists of 6 questions in which students must score each item on ascale of 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the teaching provided. For theevaluation of a subject was taken into account the response rate (number of different studentsresponding to the survey divided by the total number of students enrolled in the course). In all surveysof the studied period, the scores for each of the items in the different subjects were always higher than7. So overall, satisfaction is high and has not changed over time. Lower scores are linked to a lowerresponse rate. In general, both the response rate and the scores obtained in the first academic year ofteaching the Master are higher to the later years probably because the first surveys were conducted inperson the assessment day.In conclusion, although the teaching of the Master is at distance basically, conducting surveyselectronically may lead to unrepresentative results of teaching quality perceived by the student.
机译:在大学的在线或远程学习的引入是对大师的研究,虚拟学习的研究表现为一种解决传统教育无法解决的问题:地理问题,缺乏时间,需求,提供更多培训机会。然而,尽管电子学习中的繁荣,但它不应该陷入错误的想法,这是解决所有人中的所有问题的解决方案。事实上,它还具有它的缺点,因为师父之间可能几乎没有互动;反馈可能非常慢;更难以纠正材料中的错误,评估,比课堂教学更加辍学。专注于电子学习应该是战略性的,因此远程学习平台的实施应该允许实施几乎不适用于传统课程的工具并且有一个可以获得更有效的学习。通过这一框架,我们提供的经验我们参与大学教学大师在大学教学大学的职业风险预防,使用Moodle平台在线模式教授在线模式,允许使用不同的展览资源(练习,论坛,问卷)来鼓励学习不同主题。当时米格尔赫坦德大学质量计划服务,对感知质量格式的学生进行了调查。本研究的目的是观察它如何通过这些调查改变诅咒的质量。自2010/2011年学年介绍以来,在掌握不同课程中教授的每个科目的调查结果。在第一年期间,使用了关于7条质量教学质量的学生调查的标准模型,而在最近的学术年份,更好的调查模型在硕士中提出了更好的教学,其中包括6个问题,其中学生必须得分每个项目在1到10的坐骑上,更高的分数表明对所提供的教学更加满意。考虑到受试者的评估,考虑到响应率(与调查相对应的不同学生的数量除以课程注册的学生总数)。在研究期间的所有调查中,不同受试者中每个项目的分数总是高于7。总的来说,满意度高,随着时间的推移没有变化。较低的分数与更低的响应速率相关联。一般而言,响应率和在第一学年中获得的分数都达到了师父的第一学年,可能是较晚的几年,可能是因为第一次调查是在分别的评估日中进行了评估日。在结论中,尽管硕士的教学基本上是距离的,进行电力测量可能导致学生所感知的教学质量的不佳结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号