首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(188) SHARING EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK @ STUDENTS: IMPACT ON STUDENTS′ AND TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT LEARNING
【24h】

(188) SHARING EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK @ STUDENTS: IMPACT ON STUDENTS′ AND TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT LEARNING

机译:(188)分享有效的反馈@学生:对学生的影响和教师对学习的看法

获取原文

摘要

This paper focuses on the implementation of a Feedback-Providing Program - FP2 - within students testing instruments and in the analysis of its impact on students′ and teachers′ perceptions concerning the learning and teaching process, during a school-year length period. It was considered a sample of 277 students and 15 teachers, from basic to secondary level. It was adopted a quasiexperimental design, to evaluate the effectiveness of the feedback intervention in a real school context. The feedback-providing program intervention consists in delivering students’ tests with error and feedback analysis, made by the teacher, online and in the classroom. Students do not have instant access to quantitative grade. After receiving the test students work in pairs, exchanging and analysing their own tests and feedback, fulfilling an online progression checklist. The teacher monitors and facilitates the students’ feedback analysis process. The feedback was given within each test among a colour code: strengths (green); upgrading areas (yellow); strategies to success (violet); specific challenges (red). The following quantitative methods were used in this study: (i) 2 students′ questionnaires (feedback online students’ survey), before and after feedback-providing program intervention; (ii) 2 teachers′ questionnaires (feedback online teachers’ survey), before and after feedback-providing program intervention. As qualitative methods, it was developed 3 instruments: (i) error and test′s feedback analysis sessions students’ progression checklist fulfilment; (ii) error and test′s feedback sessions students’ progression observation by the teacher; (iii) semi-structured interview, during and after intervention, to randomized selected 3 students and 3 teachers. All formal procedures were performed with local education authorities. Data collected from students, before and after feedback-providing program intervention, as the students’ questionnaires and global testing average scores were analysed using the software Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS v.23).
机译:本文侧重于实施反馈提供计划 - FP2 - 在学生测试仪器中,并在学校年度长期期间分析其对学生的影响和教学过程的影响。它被认为是277名学生和15名教师的样本,从基本到二级。它采用了一种Quasiexpery设计,评估了真实学校背景下的反馈干预的有效性。提供的提供计划干预包括通过教师,在线和教室的误差和反馈分析提供学生的测试。学生没有即时访问量程。在接收到测试学生成对工作后,交换和分析自己的测试和反馈,履行在线进展清单。教师监控并促进学生的反馈分析过程。在颜色码的每个测试中给出了反馈:强度(绿色);升级区域(黄色);成功的策略(紫罗兰);具体挑战(红色)。本研究中使用了以下定量方法:(i)2学生的问卷(反馈在线学生的调查),提供反馈提供计划干预之前和之后; (ii)2教师调查问卷(反馈在线教师调查),在提供计划干预之前和之后。作为定性方法,它开发了3个乐器:(i)错误和测试的反馈分析会议学生的进展清单履行; (ii)错误和测试的反馈会议学生教师的进展观察; (iii)半结构化访谈,干预期间和后期,随机选择3名学生和3名教师。所有正式程序都与当地教育机构进行。使用软件统计包进行社会科学的软件统计包(SPSS V.23),分析了从学生的问卷和全球测试平均分数的反馈提供计划干预之前和之后收集的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号