首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Sensor Networks >A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Distributed Collision-free MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks
【24h】

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Distributed Collision-free MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks

机译:水下传感器网络分布式碰撞MAC协议的比较绩效评价

获取原文

摘要

The design of Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols for UWSNs poses many challenges because of their long propagation delay, high mobility, limited bandwidth, and high bit error rate. Due to these unique acoustic channel characteristics, most contention-based MAC protocols are costly. Thus, collisions and retransmissions should be efficiently handled at the MAC layer in order to reduce the energy cost and to improve throughput and fairness across the network. As a consequence, they do not perform as efficiently as their achieved performance in terrestrial networks. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of three recently reported distributed collision-free MAC protocols; namely, ED-MAC, DL-MAC, and GC-MAC under various operational conditions. An extensive simulation study is carried out to compare the performance of these MAC protocols in terms of packet delivery ratio (PDR), throughput, and energy consumption with different scenarios (narrow and shallow networks) under varying traffic rates and numbers of nodes. Our study results showed that ED-MAC reaches the best energy efficiency in a narrow scenario with a light load than DL-MAC and GC-MAC protocols. While DL-MAC is a suitable choice for both scenarios among others in terms of flexibility. In terms of reliability and scalability, GC-MAC achieves the best performance in both scenarios than other protocols.
机译:由于它们的长传播延迟,高迁移率,有限的带宽和高比特差率,UWSNS的媒体访问控制(MAC)协议的设计具有许多挑战。由于这些唯一的声学信道特性,基于大多数基于竞争的MAC协议昂贵。因此,应在MAC层有效处理冲突和重传,以降低能量成本并提高网络上的吞吐量和公平性。因此,它们不会随着他们在地面网络中实现的表现而有效地进行。在本文中,我们评估了三个最近报告的分布式碰撞MAC协议的表现;即,在各种操作条件下,ED-MAC,DL-MAC和GC-MAC。进行了广泛的仿真研究,以在不同方案(窄和浅网络)下的数据包传递比(PDR),吞吐量和能量消耗方面进行比较这些MAC协议的性能,并在不同的流量率和节点数量下进行不同的场景(窄和浅网络)。我们的研究结果表明,ED-MAC在比DL-MAC和GC-MAC协议的光负荷的狭窄情景中达到了最佳能效。 While DL-MAC is a suitable choice for both scenarios among others in terms of flexibility.在可靠性和可扩展性方面,GC-MAC在这两种情况下实现了比其他协议的最佳性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号