首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Fracture Fatigue and Wear >Comparative Research on Calculation Methods of Stress Intensity Factors and Crack Propagation Criterion
【24h】

Comparative Research on Calculation Methods of Stress Intensity Factors and Crack Propagation Criterion

机译:应力强度因子和裂纹传播标准计算方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

In order to compare the calculation methods of stress intensity factors and crack propagation criterion, and to find the best method to calculate stress intensity factors and crack propagation criterion. The FRANC3D software was used to calculate and analyze the specimen with a center crack, the specimen with a single side crack, the specimen with bilateral cracks and the cylindrical specimen with a deep buried elliptical crack. The calculation methods of three stress intensity factors including displacement correlation method, virtual crack closure integral method, and M-Integral method were compared. The relative advantages and disadvantages of two crack propagation criterions including maximum circumferential stress criterion and maximum strain energy release rate criterion were studied. The results show that in the calculation methods of three stress intensity factors, the accuracy of the M-Integral method and the virtual crack closure integral method is better, and the displacement correlation method is poorer. Between the two criterions of crack propagation, maximum circumferential stress criterion is superior to maximum strain energy release rate criterion.
机译:为了比较应力强度因子和裂缝传播标准的计算方法,并找到计算应力强度因子和裂纹传播标准的最佳方法。 Franc3D软件用于计算和分析具有中心裂缝的样品,标本用单侧裂纹,具有双侧裂缝的样品和具有深层掩埋椭圆裂纹的圆柱形样品。比较了三种应力强度因子,包括位移相关方法,虚拟裂纹闭合积分法和M-积分法的三个应力强度因子的计算方法。研究了包括最大圆周应力标准和最大应变能释放率标准的两个裂缝传播标准的相对优缺点。结果表明,在三个应力强度因子的计算方法中,M-Intional方法和虚拟裂纹闭合整体方法的准确性更好,并且位移相关方法较差。在两个裂纹传播的标准之间,最大圆周应力标准优于最大应变能释放速率标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号