This study aimed to know: (i) the effect of a reciprocal teaching style with eyes, hands, and foot coordination overall towards field tennis groundstroke capabilities; (ii) the effect of a reciprocal with high of eye, hand and foot coordination towards tennis groundstroke capabilities; (iii) the effect of a reciprocal teaching style with low of eyes, hands, and foot coordination overall towards tennis groundstroke capabilities. This study was conducted by quantitative research methods in the form of experiments, sampling by purposive sampling, i.e. with the criteria of the foot hand-eye coordination group. To analyze the data, it was used analysis of variance (anava) with a significance level of α = 0.05. Before doing variance analysis, as a condition to meet the requirements for data analysis, the sample normality test was first performed with Liliferos, while to find the level of homogeneity of the variance of the population using the Barlett test. The conclusion of this study was: (i) student reciprocal style learning model without eye, hand and foot coordination have groundstroke abilities in a good category; (ii) student reciprocal style learning model with high eye, hand and foot coordination have groundstroke abilities in a good category; (iii) student reciprocal style learning model with low eye, hand and foot coordination have groundstroke abilities in a good category. It is recommended for instructors and lecturers in field tennis to use a reciprocal style of teaching in applying for field tennis courses.
展开▼
