首页> 外文会议>CIRP Life Cycle Engineering Conference >Product Recoverability: A Review of Assessment Methods
【24h】

Product Recoverability: A Review of Assessment Methods

机译:产品可恢复性:评估方法综述

获取原文

摘要

Today, companies need to assess the recoverability of their products from the design phase, not only for legislative reasons but also to appraise how they will be able to recover all or part of their value when they reach end of life. The main reference calculation methods are both the norm ISO 22628, which addresses the automotive industry, and the IEC/TR 62635 report, which addresses the electrical and electronic equipment industry. Both reference methods only focus on mass preservation indicators (as legislation requires) but ignore important aspects such as material quality loss, environmental impacts, and economic value preservation. Indeed, multi-criteria assessment is needed as it can be a key factor for both improving product design and to help designers integrate recycled materials into their products. In that regard, several other studies exploring multi-criteria analysis (i.e. technical, economic and/or environmental-based) do exist. The aim of this paper is to (i) present a critical review of current recoverability assessment methods and (ii) find the existing gaps by comparing whether the used indicators meet the designer needs or not.
机译:今天,公司需要从设计阶段评估其产品的可回收性,而不仅仅是出于立法原因,还要评估它们如何在达到生命结束时恢复全部或部分价值。主要参考计算方法均为常规ISO 22628,它解决了汽车行业,以及IEC / TR 62635报告,该报告解决了电气和电子设备行业。两个参考方法只关注大规模保存指标(即立法要求),但忽略了物质质量损失,环境影响和经济价值保护等重要方面。实际上,需要多标准评估,因为它可以是改进产品设计的关键因素,并帮助设计师将再生材料集成到其产品中。在这方面,存在探索多标准分析的其他几项研究(即技术,经济和/或环境)确实存在。本文的目的是(i)呈现对当前可收回性评估方法的关键审查,并通过比较使用的指标是否满足设计人员来找到现有的差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号