首页> 外文会议>Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards >Process Safety Behaviours: What are they and how to they link to Occupational (Personal) Safety Behaviours
【24h】

Process Safety Behaviours: What are they and how to they link to Occupational (Personal) Safety Behaviours

机译:过程安全行为:它们是什么以及如何链接到职业(个人)安全行为

获取原文

摘要

Occupational (Personal) Safety behaviours are well understood and successful programmes have been implemented worldwide to promote safe behaviours and eliminate unsafe behaviours. Process Safety behaviours, in contrast, have not been well defined and efforts to define them and improve them have been fragmented. In the well-known Process Safety triangle, the base of the triangle is often stated as "Unsafe behaviour or insufficient operating discipline". This is not usually illustrated by examples and implies that the only important Process Safety behaviours are those of the front line operating staff. Programmes to eliminate or reduce the incidence of poor Process Safety behaviours, however defined, have been minimal and there is little guidance on changing the impact of subtler Process Safety behaviours by, for example, engineers. By their nature, Process Safety behaviours can often be remote from the actual incident and consequence and the behaviour might have occurred months before the incident. The author will suggest several useful guidelines and recommendations from 30 years of running hazardous plant, dealing with many incidents and 18 years of consulting as a professional process safety engineer. These will deal with the following: What are typical Process Safety behaviours that are required for: 1. operating personnel; 2. engineering staff; 3. management. The links between Process Safety and Occupational Safety (Personal Safety) will be explored. The relationship between Process Safety behaviours and broader aspects like organisation culture and leadership will also be examined. The author will also include consideration of studies done on organisational decision making such as was evident in disasters like the Deepwater Horizon oil rig fire and explosion.
机译:职业(个人)安全行为得到很好的理解,并且在全球范围内实施了成功的计划,以促进安全行为,消除不安全的行为。相比之下,流程安全行为并未明确定义,并努力定义它们并改善它们已经分散。在众所周知的过程安全三角形中,三角形的底座通常被称为“不安全的行为或操作学科不足”。这通常不是通过示例说明的,并意味着唯一重要的过程安全行为是前线操作人员的安全行为。然而,措施消除或减少流程安全行为差的发病率,但定义了,对例如工程师来改变子地点流程安全行为的影响几乎没有指导。通过他们的性质,过程安全行为往往远离实际事件和后果,事件前几个月可能发生的行为。作者将提出30年运行危险厂的几项有用指导方针和建议,处理许多事件和18年的咨询作为专业过程安全工程师。这些将处理以下内容:以下是典型的过程安全行为:1。操作人员; 2.工程人员; 3.管理层。将探索过程安全和职业安全(个人安全)之间的联系。还将审查过程安全行为与更广泛的方面之间的关系,如组织文化和领导层。提交人还将包括对组织决策的研究审议,如深水地平线石油架火和爆炸等灾难中显而易见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号