首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Engineering Mechanics >Verification of Ductile Fracture Criteria Based On Selected Calibration Tests
【24h】

Verification of Ductile Fracture Criteria Based On Selected Calibration Tests

机译:基于选定的校准测试的延性骨折标准验证

获取原文

摘要

Phenomenological ductile fracture criteria represent, among others, one of powerful tools for prediction of ductile fracture. These criteria are based on evaluating damage throughout the solid body as a response to straining. The damage is influenced by plasticity but not vice versa. Therefore, these criteria are often called uncoupled as they do not mutually couple the damage and plasticity. One of immense advantages of such criteria is a possibility not only to predict the crack initiation but also to follow the propagation based on the damage. Moreover, it is not restricted for one specific locus but the damage is evaluated in the entire solid body and one or more cracks can be tracked simultaneously or sequentially. Ductile fracture criteria are calibrated on the basis of several independent calibration tests under various stress states. One way how to verify calibrated model is to simulate numerically an experimental tests and follow the crack initiation and propagation. In the present study, selected phenomenological criteria were calibrated using various calibration tests. Then, selected calibration tests were simulated together with implemented ductile fracture criteria. In our case, the verification is carried out on tensile cylindrical specimens. Finally, computationally obtained results were compared to the experimentally observed ones and the prediction ability and reliability of selected phenomenological criteria is discussed.
机译:现象学延性骨折标准包括用于预测延性骨折的强大工具之一。这些标准基于在整个固体中的评估损伤作为对紧张的反应。损害受到可塑性的影响,但反之亦然。因此,这些标准通常被称为解耦,因为它们不相互耦合损坏和可塑性。这种标准的巨大优点之一是不仅可以预测裂纹启动的可能性,而且还可以基于损坏跟踪传播。此外,它不限于一个特定基因座,但在整个实体中评估损伤,并且可以同时或顺序地跟踪一个或多个裂缝。基于各种应力状态下的几个独立校准测试的基础上校准了韧性骨折标准。如何验证校准模型的一种方法是在数字上模拟实验测试并遵循裂纹启动和传播。在本研究中,使用各种校准测试校准所选现象学标准。然后,将所选择的校准测试与实施的延性骨折标准一起模拟。在我们的情况下,验证在拉伸圆柱形样本上进行。最后,将计算上获得的结果与实验观察到的结果进行了比较,并且讨论了所选现象标准的预测能力和可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号