首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Neuroscience and Cognitive Brain Information >N-Back Training and Transfer Effects in Healthy Young Subjects Using EEG
【24h】

N-Back Training and Transfer Effects in Healthy Young Subjects Using EEG

机译:使用脑电站的健康青年对象的正面训练和转移效应

获取原文

摘要

We investigate whether N-Back working memory (WM) training improves both trained WM- and untrained cognitive function performance (transfer effects). Previous studies showed that EEG responses, in particular Event Related Potentials (ERPs), can be used as a measure of working memory load during cognitive task performance. Here, we used three groups of young healthy participants to assess the effect of N-Back training: cognitive training group (CTG), active control group (ACG) and passive control group (PCG). The cognitive training group performed an N-Back task with 3 difficulty levels (1, 2, 3-Back), the active control group used the same task but with lower difficulty levels (0, 1, 2-Back), and the control group no N-Back training at all. Pre- and post-tests were administered to all three groups to gauge any transfer effects (partial memory, attention, reasoning and intelligence). Our results showed that training improved N-Back task performance for CTG participants compared to ACG and PCG participants. In contrast, transfer effects were not so clear across cognitive tasks but transfer effects were present and stronger in CTG compared to ACG for attention (TOVA test).
机译:我们调查N-Back工作记忆(WM)培训是否提高了训练有素的WM和未受训练的认知功能性能(转移效果)。以前的研究表明,EEG响应,特别是事件相关电位(ERP),可以用作认知任务性能期间的工作内存负荷的量度。在这里,我们使用了三组年轻健康参与者来评估N-Back训练的影响:认知训练组(CTG),主动对照组(ACG)和被动控制组(PCG)。认知培训组用3个难度(1,2,3 - 背面)执行了N背部任务,主动控制组使用相同的任务,但难度级别较低(0,1,2 - 背面)和控制小组没有N背部培训。对所有三组进行预先和测试后,以衡量任何转移效应(部分记忆,注意力,推理和智能)。我们的结果表明,与ACG和PCG参与者相比,CTG参与者的培训培训改善了CTG参与者的N背部任务性能。相比之下,在认知任务中,转移效果并不是那么明确,但与ACG的注意(TOVA测试)相比,CTG中存在转移效果和更强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号