首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Social Science >Appeasement, Rearmament, and the British Left-Wing Press: The Case of the Daily Herald
【24h】

Appeasement, Rearmament, and the British Left-Wing Press: The Case of the Daily Herald

机译:绥靖,重症和英国左翼新闻:每日预示的情况

获取原文

摘要

This paper provides an investigation into the responses of Britain's left-wing press between 1935-39 to key international developments, specifically fascist expansionism, and the (Conservative) government's foreign and defence policy. By examining the shifting relationship between editorial positioning and the development of such official policies as 'Appeasement' and Rearmament, this study argues for a new appreciation of the interdependency of media, mass politics, and policymaking. In doing so it aims to supplement the existing historiography on the sources of Britain's changing interwar foreign and defence policy, which has traditionally featured elite-centric studies of policymaking, with the public and opposition seen as bystanders to 'statecraft'. The value of the Left as a specific object of research lies in the expanding impact of democratic mass politics on interwar Britain's policy formulation. In this context, public opinion, as reflected in and shaped by newspapers, gained unprecedented impact on high politics. In a period when newspapers (typically with an avowed political alignment) represented dominant organs for the articulation of public opinion, press analysis offers the most effective insight into the masses' relationship to policy. A methodological framework for interpreting public opinion through newspapers is proposed, with an appraisal of the nuances of the press landscape in 1930s Britain. This paper's analysis is periodised around several international crises from 1935 to 1939 which both highlighted editorial positions and catalysed their shift. I conclude that revisions in leftist attitudes speak to a contingent yet meaningful relationship with the Baldwin and Chamberlain Governments' foreign and defence policy.
机译:本文向英国左翼媒体的回应进行了调查,1935 - 39年至主要的国际发展,特别是法西斯扩张主义以及(保守)政府的外国和国防政策。通过审查编辑定位与“绥靖”和后肢这种官方政策的发展之间的转移关系,本研究旨在对媒体,群集政治和政策制定的相互依存性的新欣赏。在这样做,它旨在补充英国变化的交织间外国和国防政策来源的现有史,传统上具有以精英为中心的政策制作研究,公众和反对派被视为“雕像”的旁观者。作为一个特定研究对象的左边的价值在于民主群集政治对白球政策制定的扩大影响。在这种情况下,舆论,正如报纸上反映和形状,对高政治产生了前所未有的影响。在报纸(通常具有公开的政治对准)代表占舆论的宣传的主导器官时期,新闻分析提供了对群众与政策关系的最有效的见解。提出了一种通过报纸来解释公众意见的方法论框架,评估了20世纪30年代英国新闻景观的细微差别。本文的分析是在1935年至1939年的几个国际危机周期内,这两种国际危机都突出显示了编辑位置并催化了他们的转变。我得出结论,左翼态度的修订与俾路支和张伯兰政府的外国和国防政策谈到了一项左右但有意义的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号