首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the transportation research board >Does Urban Living Influence Baby Boomers’ Travel Behavior?
【24h】

Does Urban Living Influence Baby Boomers’ Travel Behavior?

机译:城市生活是否会影响婴儿潮一代的旅行行为?

获取原文

摘要

We compare the travel behavior of urban versus suburban baby boomers in the Boston metropolitan area. Using propensity score matching to attempt to control for self-selection and data from two surveys implemented in 2008 and 2010, we find that the urban boomers tend to be less automobile-dependent than suburban baby boomers. Urban baby boomers also make more recreational non-motorized transport (NMT), social, utilitarian, and transit commute trips. Most of these differences seem to be primarily a result of the urban setting, not the particular preferences of boomers living in urban settings. We find very small self-selection effects on automobile commuting, recreational NMT, and utilitarian trips: one to seven percent of observed influence. We also find some evidence that Baby Boomers’ preference for social activities tends to be mismatched to their environments – suburban boomers want more social opportunities than their settings enable. For public transport, we find a relatively large self-selection effect, 43 percent of observed influence, suggesting a transit-oriented boomer market segment exists.
机译:我们在波士顿大都市区比较城市与郊区婴儿潮一代的旅行行为。使用倾向得分匹配试图控制自2008年和2010年实施的两次调查的自我选择和数据,我们发现城市潮一代往往比郊区婴儿潮一代依赖于汽车依赖。城市婴儿潮一代还制造了更多的娱乐非机动运输(NMT),社会,功利和过境通勤旅行。这些差异的大部分似乎主要是城市环境的结果,而不是生活在城市环境中的潮一代的特殊偏好。我们为汽车通勤,娱乐态度和功利主义旅行中发现了非常小的自我选择效果:观察到的影响的一度达7%。我们还发现一些证据表明,婴儿潮一代对社交活动的偏好往往被不匹配到他们的环境 - 郊区潮一代希望比他们的设置能够更具社交机会。对于公共交通,我们发现一个相对较大的自我选择效果,43%的观察到的影响力,建议存在过境的潮一代的潮流市场分部。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号