首页> 外文会议>IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government >Issues and Guiding Principles for Opening Governmental Judicial Research Data
【24h】

Issues and Guiding Principles for Opening Governmental Judicial Research Data

机译:开放政府司法研究数据的问题和指导原则

获取原文

摘要

The opening of data is considered to provide many benefits. However, opening up data by public bodies is a complex and ill-understood activity. Although many public bodies might be willing to open up their data, they lack any systematic guidance. In this paper, guidance is provided by investigating the publishing processes at the Dutch Research and Documentation Centre (WODC), which owns governmental judicial research data. We developed guidance by providing 1) a list of issues that play a role in deciding whether to open data, 2) an alternative to completely publishing data (i.e. restricted access) and 3) solutions for overcoming some of the issues. The latter include dealing with privacy-sensitive data, deletion policies, publishing after embargo periods instead of not publishing at all, adding related documents and adding information about the quality and completeness of datasets. The institutional context should be taken into account when using the guidance, as opening data requires considerable changes of organizations.
机译:数据的开放被认为是提供许多益处。但是,公共机构开放数据是一个复杂而不理解的活动。虽然许多公共机构可能愿意打开他们的数据,但他们缺乏任何系统的指导。在本文中,通过调查荷兰研究和文件中心(WODC)的出版过程来提供指导,该文件拥有政府司法研究数据。我们通过提供1)通过提供一个问题列表在决定数据,2)以克服一些问题的替代方案来播放替代数据的替代方案的替代问题。后者包括处理隐私敏感数据,删除策略,在禁运期后发布,而不是根本不发布,添加相关文档并添加有关数据集的质量和完整性的信息。使用该指导时应考虑制度上下文,因为开放数据需要大量的组织变更。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号